Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

The thing is, you gotta pay though for a top Edge. He'll never be at the very top tier like Pep was because we'd have seen that already. We're kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place; it will be a big time contract for a tweener.

Between this deal and us turning down 2 firsts burns has crazy leverage on us now.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Thanks to the franchise tag, we will always have the leverage. Declining the trade does not provide any leverage to burns. I’m actually interested in how you think us not trading creates “leverage” for burns 

Because it shows how much we "value" him.   And in regards to the FT it looks like it will be north of 20 million in 2024.  Its a lot but not back breaking.  I think the overall guaranteed money he will be looking for could be crippling down the road.  That in the past, is always where we get ourselves in trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Because it shows how much we "value" him.   And in regards to the FT it looks like it will be north of 20 million in 2024.  Its a lot but not back breaking.  I think the overall guaranteed money he will be looking for could be crippling down the road.  That in the past, is always where we get ourselves in trouble

Doesn’t us “valuing” him create leverage for us? Bc the franchise told the league we aren’t trading him bc we want him to be apart of the franchise?  I just don’t see a situation where that is used against us. 
 

It really depends on how the guaranteed money is broken up. With as many picks we have this coming draft, I expect the FO to front load his contract, so we don’t have to deal with it down the road. Much like we did with DJ.

 

im going to use how the current front office regimen structures contracts as examples And not our previous gms.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

The franchise tag exists. And in the event the Panthers get an even nicer offer next year they can heavily consider it. Some people need to take a break from this trade talk and step back from the cliff.

How are they going to get a nicer offer now? The Rams wanted him cheap(1M) this year. His value went down when the deadline passed. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I do not want nor have the energy to start a sanders vs BY topic..... Heres where Im at, what else is Titans Levi's or colts Arich going give in a trade...... Im no sanders fan, but it wouldn't bug me if caralas/Brandt/tepper/who____ wanted to go another route.....yes its been a QB whirlwind since ...to long.... still Im not sold on the skill and talent of one BY.   I think this is first year in many in which Carolina with have the same HC, QB, and GM. Its been a mess...
    • No one should be the least bit surprised by this organization doing powerfully stupid stuff. You don't accidentally achieve the worst record in the NFL since 2018, it takes consistently awful decisions to pull that off. And then the cherry on top of the dog poo sundae is that every year when we're closing in on a top 5 pick, here comes a couple of meaningless moral victories to fug that up. I'd be curious what percentage of our wins in the Tepper era have come when we're mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. 
    • I think remember doing mock Sims for Carolina as many others, I don't think any of picked RBs in any rounds.... I honestly had the same "my team let me down" feels with the BY pick........just WHY all the holes and one of the spots were they have depth AND the RB market is at the lowest point in NFL history..... Just a    Per normal the huddle was for all for Zach Frazier, not me I wanted Marshawn Kneeland. Plus I wanted to REMAIN AT whatever LA pick and NOT TRADE UP FOR A ACL injuried RB. My friend was right, Dan did draft like he was still playing in his era..... ugh, Brandt and Dan cannot have that same problem this year......its beginning year 2 of a full 3 year rebuild..... for fugs sake, please find some talent and depth in later rounds....
×
×
  • Create New...