Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burns is 24.  If you think about it, most of our DEs (Hardy, Johnson, Rucker) were STs until the third year.  Peppers was the exception. 

Burns is about to explode as a pass rusher, and he will be good until he is 34.  DEs like him are hard to find.  You have to pay the man.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They didn't offer two 1sts for a one year rental. They would've extended Burns. There's always going to be a highest offer in any trade situation. Did you expect someone to offer more than two 1sts?

That’s there choice. But it doesn’t make him more valuable. They have to give him a chunk of guaranteed money they don’t have. 
 

  Do you expect to receive a similar offer this off-season? That’s the question. If the desperate, win now Rams offered what people are saying is equivalent to a 2nd and a 3rd in 2023, with a half season at almost free, what are the offers to pay him going to be then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would've taken the picks, but I don't necessarily think that Burns loses value or gains value because we didn't. He's still a premier rusher and really young to boot. He hasn't really even hit his prime yet. 

Just like I saw people way undervaluing him before the deadline (talking about a trading him for a third), there seem to be people undervaluing him now. He's very young, talented and proven. We'll pay him, or there will be suitors waiting to give us those two ones or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Huh? Chubb’s deal is $24M per year and Kirk’s was $18M per year. Burns has better stats than Chubb, so he’s going to be in the $25-30M range.

Kirk got $30 a year I thought. That’s what I heard at the time and blew my mind

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Toomers said:

That’s there choice. But it doesn’t make him more valuable. They have to give him a chunk of guaranteed money they don’t have. 
 

  Do you expect to receive a similar offer this off-season? That’s the question. If the desperate, win now Rams offered what people are saying is equivalent to a 2nd and a 3rd in 2023, with a half season at almost free, what are the offers to pay him going to be then? 

Yeah, his value isn't going to go down. He's still a young pass rusher with top tier talent. If we need to trade whim we're not going to have any issues getting excellent return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Hill is the highest paid WR and his deal is $30M. Not sure where you are getting your numbers. Kirk is the 18th highest paid WR at $18M per year. To be frank, Hill is more of a game changer than Burns and it might not really be close.

I dunno if my memory is just off but I remember Hill getting $35mil a year and Kirk getting $30, and Adam’s getting just under Hill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea looks like my memory was just off. Kirk got 4 years up to $84mil, Adams got 5 years 141.25mil and Hill got 4 years 120. Point holds though. If Kirk got $21mil a year, a top DE contract should blow a mid tier WR’s contract out of the water. Hill is more of a game changer, sure, but WR isn’t a more important position than DE and Burns is going to get upper tier DE money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Seeing as how Reddick produces almost the same stats for only $15M, we are out two firsts and an extra $10-15M a year. I still would have rather had Reddick, Corbett and 2 firsts than Burns because with the new contract that’s exactly what it will be. If the Rams tail off like I expect, ooh wee. Still like Burns but that’s a haul. People seemed so into the firsts without realizing how much Burns will cost and that that $25-30M would have given us his replacement/two very solid starters and the two firsts are the cherry on top.

Its like we fleeced ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnwell on Burns:

Quote

 

On that level, this deal is simple. The Rams need an edge rusher. They have first-round picks. The Panthers need first-round picks, especially after trading draft capital away to acquire Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield. Most non-quarterbacks aren't worth two first-round picks, and -- with the 2019 Ramsey deal as a notable exception -- most teams that trade away a star for multiple first-rounders typically come away winning the deal. Easy enough, right?

Not really. To start, the Rams don't have their 2023 first-rounder, which is going to the Lions as part of the Matthew Stafford deal. The Panthers would be accepting first-rounders in 2024 and 2025 for Burns, making those picks less valuable in the eyes of some NFL front offices. A 2025 pick from the Rams might be incredibly valuable if Sean McVay and Aaron Donald are retired, but in the case of Carolina general manager Scott Fitterer, trading Burns for a pick still three years away might ensure that someone else is the one actually making that selection.

On top of that, Burns is only 24 years old. He's still two years away from free agency. Even if the Panthers take three years to get back into playoff contention, he should still be in the prime of his career. We've seen teams such as the Eagles and Giants turn their fate around quicker than it might have seemed after they fired their coaches in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The Panthers might feel like they can contend in a disintegrating NFC South as early as next season if they land the right quarterback and/or right coach this offseason, which would make trading Burns for 2024 and 2025 picks illogical.

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even 49ers/Dophins type offense requires a quarterback to complete high school throws, which Bryce simply can't do. 
    • The bolded paragraph basically confirms that our players know what most fans have also known for quite sometime: Bryce is the problem.   Panthers lose, but there’s a different vibe since Andy Dalton replaced Bryce Young Joseph Person CHARLOTTE, N.C. — When Joe Burrow and a desperate Cincinnati Bengals team were putting up touchdowns quicker than department store Christmas displays in late September, you figured the Carolina Panthers were headed toward Blowout City. Down 31-14 late in the third quarter, another Panthers team — like the one from a few weeks ago — would have folded up, eaten a 30-point loss and tried to beat the traffic out of Bank of America Stadium. Instead, the Panthers scored on consecutive possessions, handed Burrow his first interception of the season and pulled within a touchdown midway through the fourth quarter. And while the Panthers didn’t hand Burrow a fourth loss to start the season, they at least kept things competitive Sunday before falling 34-24. And when you’re coming off a 2-15 season and just benched last year’s No. 1 pick two games into this one, that will have to suffice. “I don’t call it a moral victory. A loss is a loss,” cornerback Jaycee Horn said. “But at the end of the day, you could feel the vibe that we’re getting better as a team. Can’t deny that. We’re gonna find a way to shake back and go out there next week and get a dub.” Carolina coach Dave Canales speaks with QB Andy Dalton during the game Sunday as Bryce Young looks on. (Bob Donnan / Imagn Images_ The most obvious difference is at quarterback, where Andy Dalton wasn’t as on-point as he was in Vegas but still turned in a “solid day” at the office, as first-year coach Dave Canales called it. Canales isn’t asking Dalton to do too much: Get the Panthers in the right play, try to hit the first read and don’t put the ball in jeopardy. Whether it’s lingering effects from his 62-sack rookie season or something else, those are things Bryce Young wasn’t doing as the Panthers started 0-2 while being outscored 73-13. And when the quarterback isn’t playing well, it has a way of sucking the energy out of an entire organization. But there was a different feeling Sunday at Bank of America Stadium, where the Panthers went toe-to-toe with an AFC team that has a franchise quarterback and playoff expectations. Also of note: No fans were seen with bags over their heads or heard chanting for the owner to sell the team. Progress. “I think something flipped,” right guard Robert Hunt said. “We’re just trying to win some games. Guys are clicking. We never felt out of it today. We were saying the whole time, ‘We’re about to go down and win this game.’ Unfortunately, it didn’t go our way.” What flipped is the quarterback, though players don’t want to call out Young because they like him and voted him a team captain less than a month ago. Plus, they might need him if something in Dalton’s 36-year-old body stretches or snaps the way it did Sunday for veteran linebackers Shaq Thompson and Josey Jewell. But Canales has indicated he plans to ride Dalton as long as he’s producing, much like rookie receiver Xavier Legette rode his imaginary horse — inspired by his actual horse named Dolla Bill — back to the sideline Sunday following his first career touchdown. Legette’s performance against the Bengals personified where the Panthers (1-3) are nearly a quarter of a season into the Canales/Dan Morgan era. The former South Carolina wideout, drafted with the last pick in the first round, caught six passes (matching his total from the first three games) for 66 yards and the TD. But he also had two of the handful of drops by Panthers receivers and tight ends, a couple of which came in key spots (Diontae Johnson in the end zone on the first drive; Feleipe Franks on a fake punt that would have extended a drive). The roster might not be teeming with Pro Bowlers, but there is talent here. Like Legette, it’s about cleaning up the details. “I wouldn’t really say it’s a healthy loss because the two drops that I had, that’s the difference between winning and losing,” Legette said. “If I would have made those plays, we would have been able to stay on the field and maybe get a touchdown to win the game.” GO DEEPER Bengals top Panthers 34-24 for first win of season: Takeaways There were other examples of those little things that usually separate the winners and losers on Sundays: • Shoddy tackling on a pair of Cincinnati touchdown receptions, including a pitiful showing on a Ja’Marr Chase 63-yarder in which Xavier Woods, Charles Harris and Troy Hill all whiffed. • The offensive line failing to deliver Chuba Hubbard into the end zone on three tries from 2 yards or closer (sandwiched around that fade to Johnson on second-and-goal). • Pass rushers that never sacked Burrow and barely made him sweat, the one exception being a Jadeveon Clowney pressure that forced Burrow into a poor throw that Woods intercepted. • Nick Thurman jumping offside on third-and-4 after the Panthers had climbed back within a TD. • All those drops, including two deep balls that ticked off Johnson’s fingertips. “I’ve just gotta have those, gotta come down with those,” Johnson said. “It comes down to the details. What could I have done better to get more separation or (win) at the catch point?” The sooner the Panthers hammer out the fine points, the better. Because while there are some upcoming games they could steal, beginning next weekend in Chicago, the post-Munich portion of the schedule could get ugly, especially if the injury news on Thompson is bad. In the meantime, the uber-positive Canales will keep preaching process … and progress. That was his message Sunday. “For me just talking to the team, encouraged that our football continues to improve,” he said. “But we’ve gotta finish and we have to execute. And it all starts with me as the head coach.” It starts with the head coach and the quarterback. And if nothing else, the Panthers are in better shape than they were two weeks ago. Dalton was a workmanlike 25-of-40 for 220 yards with two touchdowns and an interception. The pick came in the first half when Trey Hendrickson beat Ikem Ekwonu and hit Dalton’s arm as he was releasing. It also looked like Dalton could have stepped up more in the pocket; Canales said he’d have to see the film. Like many of his teammates, Dalton said the mojo around the team is different, even if it didn’t result in a win Sunday. “I definitely feel it. I think just what this team has been through the last several years, I mean, we were in this game until the very end,” Dalton said. “I think for us, it’s like, all right, how can we change that? When we get to be in these moments where we have a chance to win — go drive down and win the game.” (Top photo of Diontae Johnson: Matt Kelley / Getty Images)
    • Holy poo, 2023 may be our worst draft ever.
×
×
  • Create New...