Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins extend Chubb


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

The thing is, you gotta pay though for a top Edge. He'll never be at the very top tier like Pep was because we'd have seen that already. We're kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place; it will be a big time contract for a tweener.

Between this deal and us turning down 2 firsts burns has crazy leverage on us now.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Thanks to the franchise tag, we will always have the leverage. Declining the trade does not provide any leverage to burns. I’m actually interested in how you think us not trading creates “leverage” for burns 

Because it shows how much we "value" him.   And in regards to the FT it looks like it will be north of 20 million in 2024.  Its a lot but not back breaking.  I think the overall guaranteed money he will be looking for could be crippling down the road.  That in the past, is always where we get ourselves in trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Because it shows how much we "value" him.   And in regards to the FT it looks like it will be north of 20 million in 2024.  Its a lot but not back breaking.  I think the overall guaranteed money he will be looking for could be crippling down the road.  That in the past, is always where we get ourselves in trouble

Doesn’t us “valuing” him create leverage for us? Bc the franchise told the league we aren’t trading him bc we want him to be apart of the franchise?  I just don’t see a situation where that is used against us. 
 

It really depends on how the guaranteed money is broken up. With as many picks we have this coming draft, I expect the FO to front load his contract, so we don’t have to deal with it down the road. Much like we did with DJ.

 

im going to use how the current front office regimen structures contracts as examples And not our previous gms.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

The franchise tag exists. And in the event the Panthers get an even nicer offer next year they can heavily consider it. Some people need to take a break from this trade talk and step back from the cliff.

How are they going to get a nicer offer now? The Rams wanted him cheap(1M) this year. His value went down when the deadline passed. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...