Rams Offering Two (Future) Firsts for Burns

[*FreeFua*]

I’m on the fence 

Yeah I’d love the two first rounders but then I see sh!t like this…

Plus I remember how long it took us to find our LT and think I don’t really want to do it all over with a pass rusher 

Use all our assets for a QB this offseason and go

[LordOfDaWingz]

Furthermore, a lot of you guys thought Matt Coral was the future at Qb. So I wouldn’t listen to a thing most of you have to say about team building. 

[ImaginaryKev]

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

By YOU saying "F150s", YOU are saying that people don't want Burns because he is black. That might be the most ignorant take ever.

Actually I think the current Super Bowl Champs are better judges of talent than this board that truly does consist of a lot of f150s, you're too dense to understand that bc of course you are

[pantherj]

Guys please don't bring the race card into this. That is the last thing on anyone's mind.

[ImaginaryKev]

Keep the TB in the TB, I get it I get it

The LA Rams are better judges of talent than any chud here though, that's a fact.

Burns is a Panther for life

[Gerry Green]

3 hours ago, frankw said:

If the picks weren't far off I would be more inclined to heavily consider the offer. But either way I'm just a fan and I'll let it play out and roll with the results. But I can tell you one fuging thing. I'll be here to remind the folks bitching about the losing because there will be bitching.

 

 OOU, OOU  LOL

[TheMostInterestingMan]

51 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

It's not because the people making trades have their jobs based on if they win or not. 
 

That’s why future picks are valued less. 
 

A GM isn’t valuing a 1st two years from now as high as a 1st this year, because 4 years down the road when the player picked is developed and playing well, it is highly likely a new coach and front office are the ones benefitting from it. 

Yes but why would we as fans value them differently? Cause there are fans on this board making that argument. And that is stupid.

[Catsfan69]

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

Keep the TB in the TB, I get it I get it

The LA Rams are better judges of talent than any chud here though, that's a fact.

Burns is a Panther for life

He doesn't produce.

Lathon Peppers Greene Hardy Johnson Reddick were all better than Burns.

He always disappears in crunch time.

He's not a big time player. He just isn't. 

If he was Lamar Lathon I'd almost cut someone for mentioning a trade.

But he isn't.  I've never even seen him put a kill shot on anyone. He's soft.

[JawnyBlaze]

13 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

This year's QB class is looking to be historically bad... Pickett is a turnover machine ala Bortles and Willis can't complete a pass, meanwhile we got one of the best LT in the NFL already....I'd say they made the right decision kicking the can another year

2020... Neither Fields or Mac Jones (or Wilson...or Lance) look to be great QB's. 

Yea, last year’s class was bad, I didn’t really like any of them in the 1st. I was good with Corral or Howell in the mid rounds. And the year before, I’m glad we didn’t fall for the Fields trap, the only QBs I liked there were Lawrence and Wilson. Time will tell for them but they went to historically bad teams, especially for QBs. This year however, we need to get our QB. Not next year, not years down the road. This year. 

[TheSpecialJuan]

 

[TheMostInterestingMan]

39 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

No what you said is stupid logic.  Who know what happens in 2025? You don't value potential which can vary from a number 1 pick to a number 32 pick the same as a proven commodity. Burns cost us a top 10 pick and has been everything we thought he would be.  He has stayed healthy and is the best DE we have.  Future picks are always valued less than current picks and should be.  While we aren't a player or two away we also don't need a complete rebuild. He is a core of the defense and teams gameplan against him. That is worth more than what we could get years from now.

No. This is stupid lmao. If em this were true, we would trade our 3rd for a future 1st two years from now every single year and in two years become the greatest dynasty in NFL history because we would have two 1st round picks every single season. You see how illogical this is? Lol

[ImaginaryKev]

3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He doesn't produce.

Lathon Peppers Greene Hardy Johnson Reddick were all better than Burns.

He always disappears in crunch time.

He's not a big time player. He just isn't. 

If he was Lamar Lathon I'd almost cut someone for mentioning a trade.

But he isn't.  I've never even seen him put a kill shot on anyone. He's soft.

LOL you are unintelligent (and exactly the type of f150 I was talking about)

Delete your account

Edited November 1, 2022 by ImaginaryKev

[Mr. Scot]

At this point, barring a crazy last minute announcement, probably safe to say this isn't happening.

The Panthers finished their activity when they finalized the McCaffrey trade.

[grimesgoat]

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’m on the fence 

Yeah I’d love the two first rounders but then I see sh!t like this…

Plus I remember how long it took us to find our LT and think I don’t really want to do it all over with a pass rusher 

Use all our assets for a QB this offseason and go

So draft Anderson or Myles in 2023.  They will make an impact right away.  Then we have 4 first rounders in 2024-2025 to move around and get our franchise QB.  It provides tremendous flexibility to get the guy we want.

What if Young starts falling due to size concerns.  We would have quite a bit of ammunition between our seconds and 4 future firsts to make something happen (if he is our guy).