Trade Deadline Tomorrow

[Killah_Ray]

Shaq would be the only one I could see getting traded or someone like Eiflein...

 

I'd probably listen to offers for Burns because I know we're gonna overpay him in a year or so....

[TheCasillas]

36 minutes ago, Varking said:

 

 

 

Ravens are going to have to make some tough decisions this offseason. They have only 2 million in cap space next year. It's going to be interesting to see how it all plays out.

[TheCasillas]

15 minutes ago, Killah_Ray said:

Shaq would be the only one I could see getting traded or someone like Eiflein...

Elfein is on IR. Untradeable.

[Jackie Lee]

Broncos destroyed their future with that Russ trade, and now are trading away guys lol. I don't know what to call it, it can't be a rebuild. Nothing to tank for, they're stuck with 4 more years of large Russ cap hits no matter what they do

 

[TheSpecialJuan]

I think Fitterer is done trading players 

[Basbear]

17 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I think Fitterer is done trading players 

What about JJ Jansen??

[ECHornet]

Fitt is never done listening to offers though. As it should be. 

[*FreeFua*]

1 hour ago, Soul Rebel said:

This will probably be downvoted, but I am curious what DJax would fetch on the trade market, as well as dead $$ he would cost us. I'm assuming it's similar to Shaq where it's not worth the cap hit.

I am not opposed to keeping him per se, just wondering if he could net us more in assets than his long-term projection with this team. The flip side is that between Horn-Jackson-Henderson-Taylor, we have four CBs that can compete. 

Personally, I think Taylor, though a different style of CB has equal to if not higher upside with us long-term. 

7.3 in dead, 2.2 in savings (in 2023)

I was wanting to trade Jackson last year. It made the most sense but nope. At this point unless someone gives you something of actual value (which they won’t) you keep him

Edited October 31, 2022 by *FreeFua*

[Aussie Tank]

If we don’t trade Burns no body better whinge if he keeps getting 9 sacks a year while being paid top 10 pass rusher money 

[JawnyBlaze]

14 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

If we don’t trade Burns no body better whinge if he keeps getting 9 sacks a year while being paid top 10 pass rusher money 

9 sacks a year is fine with top 10 money with everything else he brings to the table. 

[The Lobo]

Why does espn keep bringing up DJ to be traded, they will not trade him how do they not understand that? 

[TheMostInterestingMan]

3 hours ago, Varking said:

Bears will now only have to make decisions on extending Montgomery and Mooney now. And they have all the cap space in the world to help build a team now. 

Khalil Herbert already looks miles better than Montgomery. Can’t imagine they’ll feel the need to give Montgomery very much at all.

[Pejorative Miscreant]

5 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Why does espn keep bringing up DJ to be traded, they will not trade him how do they not understand that? 

Viewership I suspect.  Anything to keep eyes watching the network.  He was on the highlight reel yesterday and  Carolina did trade that Christian guy so everyone needs to keep watching in case.  But I do agree it is highly unlikely that he gets traded at this point. 

[TheCasillas]

12 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Why does espn keep bringing up DJ to be traded, they will not trade him how do they not understand that? 

im not even sure who would trade for him.... all of the usual suspects have gotten WRs. Packers arent a receiver away from competing. Giants arent going to trade their first round pick. Bears are in rebuild. Browns dont have the assets.  Maybe the Jets?