Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore should not have been penalized for helmet removal


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Possible, but what he was thinking doesn't really matter.

What he did should not have been penalized.

 

16 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

True, but it doesn’t matter what he was thinking, it happened out of bounds therefore it should not have been a penalty. 

I just don't have any sympathy here. He was in the process of taking it off in the end zone as soon as he stood up in the end zone and it came off in the white; if he's a yard closer to the goal line this is all a moot point since it would have been entirely in the end zone. Gotta be more disciplined than that, and I'm confident he and the team will (not so sure about the NFL though). 

It's not lost on me that the kicker missed a field goal earlier and should have made the kick anyway. This isn't on DJ exclusively by any means, and I daresay that the penalty was even fairly minor. An NFL kicker should make at least one of those two.

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Who cares

Pineiro proved in OT that it didn’t matter where that extra point was placed, he wasn’t hitting it 

Maybe.  You could make an argument that the dude was shaky after missing the one in regulation.  But if it was a normal XP he probably would have got it.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zaximus said:

Maybe.  You could make an argument that the dude was shaky after missing the one in regulation.  But if it was a normal XP he probably would have got it.

48 yarder still needs to be made. I truly couldn’t care less about the penalty. Yesterday that loss is on Pineiro. The dude had 2 tries with the second one being a chip shot

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

48 yarder still needs to be made. I truly couldn’t care less about the penalty. Yesterday that loss is on Pineiro. The dude had 2 tries with the second one being a chip shot

I don't blame him for the first miss.  If you are asking an in season add/backup K to hit near 50 yard XPs to win games.....that not really a kicker issue. 

The last one though a backup K or anyone that takes a NFL check has to make. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

48 yarder still needs to be made. I truly couldn’t care less about the penalty. Yesterday that loss is on Pineiro. The dude had 2 tries with the second one being a chip shot

The defense giving up 30 (plus the pick 6) deserves plenty of blame as well. Scoring 34 in the NFL should be a win.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s all a moot point. The PJ interception is what lost us this game. Missed field goals wouldn’t have mattered and overtime wouldn’t have been needed. Not a bad throw, but an amazing play by the defense. What ifs are crazy but that pick 6 turned out to be the one that hurt imo 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Maybe.  You could make an argument that the dude was shaky after missing the one in regulation.  But if it was a normal XP he probably would have got it.

Bottom line is we identified a trash kicker who should have been left at the stadium after the game. I never want to hear his name again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...