Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Falcons GameDay Thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Move the Panthers to Raleigh Grand Master

Move the Panthers to Raleigh

Posted
Posted
Just now, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Game isn't over. Falcons are trash too. But I hope this makes homers realize that all this team can do is beat up on absolute trash teams (AKA the entire NFCS) and stands no chance if they make the playoffs if they fall in ass backwards.

If we win this game, the homers will be even more galvanized. I may not log on here at all next week if that happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chiefzack said:

Is it just me or I'd like to see Darnold under coaching that appears to be more competent then we've had in a long time?

We just gonna ignore that guy brought us back from down 24 @Dallas last year and didn't get the chance to tie because the defense was gassed.

Sam is arguably the only guy on the roster that has the physical talent to win anything along the lines of playoffs or anything else, I'd rather just see what we have in him

Were a one and done team with P.J. if Sam comes out and balls out under what appears to be better coaching, we got a shot to have a respectable record.

 

Sams the only QB On our roster who has any question... give him a shot and let's either win the south or have him help us get a great pick 

 

 

Can we please stop with this? Darnold had a chance and he sucks too. We just need to roll with PJ and see what happens. If he throws 3 picks in the second half then give someone else a shot. But darnold isn’t the answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chiefzack said:

Is it just me or I'd like to see Darnold under coaching that appears to be more competent then we've had in a long time?

We just gonna ignore that guy brought us back from down 24 @Dallas last year and didn't get the chance to tie because the defense was gassed.

Sam is arguably the only guy on the roster that has the physical talent to win anything along the lines of playoffs or anything else, I'd rather just see what we have in him

Were a one and done team with P.J. if Sam comes out and balls out under what appears to be better coaching, we got a shot to have a respectable record.

 

Sams the only QB On our roster who has any question... give him a shot and let's either win the south or have him help us get a great pick 

 

 

Hes the only QB on the roster that had 4 good games in a row while here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...