Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The turf debate


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

From a business and a taxpayer perspective, I think the artificial turf absolutely makes sense, especially given our current stadium and its footprint. As a football(both kinds) fan, I want what's safest for the players, and if that's natural grass, then that's what they should have. Several of the newer stadiums like the Cardinals' and Raiders' stadiums have the moveable tray grass turf. That'd be great for BofA except for the small detail of having nowhere outside of the stadium to put it currently. I would imagine that during the assessment of the current structure and the cost estimations for upfitting/upgrades, they would have at least figured out what it would take financially and structurally to install a rollout field. It might not be structurally possible to refit the current stadium.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

You can't use Bermuda in the north.

You can, but it’s probably not a very good idea unless u really rich and can maintain it. Places like Minnesota, Iowa, Boston etc. 

NC is the part of the country where both types of lawns are acceptable but you probably have more homeowners with tall fescue than other type of turf. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Fields can be heated and drains installed underneath real turf. There's ways to do it but it's obviously a lot of maintenance and it's pricy. 

Yeah turf management is no joke if you really get in to it - ask any homeowner who does yard work as a hobby. Synthetic makes a lot of sense from pretty much every way you look at it except for player safety. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Charlotte isn't really the north.  According to that article I found KC, Baltimore, Washington, and Tennessee all have Bermuda grass fields.  Surprising to me.

I wouldn’t use Bermuda as a homeowner in the north. Golf course, sports fields, etc places with the resources the maintain it and work on it is ok. A place like a professional football field with millions of dollars to keep an eye on it and engineer a system to help with it is a good example. 
 

but if you some dad living in Cleveland or Minnesota, you probably an idiot to use Bermuda or southern grass for your house. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is factually incorrect. He was a two time Pro Bowler with the Rams and in fact statistically he was better with the Rams in his best season there than he has been with the Lions(could change with this season). Some of his per game stats have creeped into being marginally better with the Lions but there have not been dramatic differences in his play, actually. The biggest reason that McVay and he ended up splitting was McVay didn't think he could win a title with Goff. TBH.....so far he was 100% correct. Stafford almost immediately won them a SB and Goff in a historic run was about 70% of the reason the Lions faltered in the NFC championship game. He missed critical throws all over the first half and throughout the second half that he normally wouldn't. He choked. So, until Goff actually does win a SB...McVay has been right.
    • they have the best defense they've had in a long time...probably the best in the reid/mahommes era.  but i think they are probably the most beatable they've been in a while as well. record doesn't exactly bear that out, but they just don't look as strong on offense as they usually do. lots of reasons for that, like trying to build chemistry with newer receivers, but right now they just aren't as frightening as they typically are. i mean they'll probably win tomorrow, but i don't see them as the strongest team in the AFC right now. 
    • He will likely remain unsigned the remainder of this season(barring someone being in a pure QB panic AND making poor decisions) largely due to the cost. I do think he will get multiple offers to be a backup QB and perhaps a couple to potentially start this offseason.  I will continue to beat the same horse over and over.....he should go to a successful team with an established starter. If I were him, go to somewhere like SF, LAR, etc. Somewhere with a successful QB coach and brilliant offensive mind and ALSO a set situation at QB. Ride the pine and adjust for a year or two. Chill and be around better culture. I would suggest the same for Bryce but he will be limited to wherever we can trade him. 
×
×
  • Create New...