Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What’s your 2023 QB big board (including Corral)


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Allen isn’t a dual threat?  Say wut?

How many times do I have to list the definitions for you guys? It's on the previous page ffs.

 

  32 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

you should want a dual threat. our most successful qbs have been dual threats as has been the case with most of the league. read option is dominate in the league right now and pocket passers arent doing so great. 

A dual threat QB had never won the Superbowl and probably never will.

 

I want a mobile QB ala Mahomes, Steve Young, Russ, Allen, Staubach etc.

QB types worst to best

Running QB = below average passer elite runner.

Dual threat above average rusher above average passer.

Pocket Passer elite passer below average runner

Mobile QB elite passer average to above average runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s not the definition of a dual threat QB… that’s some made of mindset by yourself.

A quick Google will give you a definition… “In gridiron football, a dual-threat quarterback, also known as a running quarterback, is a quarterback (QB) who possesses the skills and physique to run with the ball if necessary.”

Making up some ridiculous definition to fit your narrative doesn’t help your argument as there isn’t a QB in the NFL that has to run… Lamar doesn’t have the accuracy that someone like Mahomes has but Lamar has better physical traits that he can use to help him win… so why wouldn’t he use them…

THERE’S NOT A SINGLE QB IN THE NFL THAT HAS TO RUN TO WIN.

Vick and The Golden Calf of Bristol had to run. Yes there are QBs like that.

And yes these are the correct definitions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

How many times do I have to list the definitions for you guys? It's on the previous page ffs.

 

  32 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

you should want a dual threat. our most successful qbs have been dual threats as has been the case with most of the league. read option is dominate in the league right now and pocket passers arent doing so great. 

A dual threat QB had never won the Superbowl and probably never will.

 

I want a mobile QB ala Mahomes, Steve Young, Russ, Allen, Staubach etc.

QB types worst to best

Running QB = below average passer elite runner.

Dual threat above average rusher above average passer.

Pocket Passer elite passer below average runner

Mobile QB elite passer average to above average runner.

You can’t make up your own definitions… who do you think you are? Fugging Merriam-Webster…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

Vick and The Golden Calf of Bristol had to run. Yes there are QBs like that.

And yes these are the correct definitions. 

No they didn’t lol… they took what the defense gave them and ran when they could. At the end of the day they had to throw the ball to win. If they only needed to run then they wouldn’t have ever thrown the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He plays QB and is being looked at to do this same because of his arm and size. I’m sure you are doing the whole QBs that run are running backs thing… clever. 

There's a flipside to that.

Not every QB that gets called a "dual threat" actually is. Some folks label any quarterback who can run and maybe halfway pass as a dual threat. Reality is the ones that aren't true passers tend to wash out of the NFL pretty quick.

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Allen can beat you solely from the pocket. He doesn't have to run to win.

Neither does Mahomes. 

They are both mobile QBs.

A duel threat has to run to win. 

Incorrect.

Allen and Mahomes are both dual threat QBs. What you're terming as a dual threat is actually a running quarterback.

If they can run but can't throw that well, that's a running quarterback. Dual threat QBs can do both effectively.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running QB’s aren’t in the NFL, it has not and won’t ever work… The Golden Calf of Bristol is the closest we’ve ever seen and the biggest play of his entire career was a pass… (overtime game winner against the Steelers in the playoffs)…

I don’t know where these random definitions come from but dual QB’s are in the NFL… they exist… and right now they are probably the best QB’s in the NFL.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

No they didn’t lol… they took what the defense gave them and ran when they could. At the end of the day they had to throw the ball to win. If they only needed to run then they wouldn’t have ever thrown the ball.

They both couldn't throw.

Vick couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.

But he was elite. That phucking dive from what seemed like the 10yd line to score against us sure pissed me off.

 

I don't want a QB that can't make the big time throws in big time situations. 

And you can't lump every QB that can somewhat throw and somewhat run all together its too broad.

 

Guys like Mahomes Staubach Young are in a separate class.

I want someone that can throw the ball like Mahomes, Brady, Allen Moon etc.

I don't care if he ever runs. If the other 10 guys do their job he shouldn't ever have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Of course he is.

Allen averages slightly more  yds per game on his career as Newton did and slightly less tds per game.

Statistically one of the better running qbs ever

He's a much much better passer than Cam was. It's not even close.

So is Lamar, Russ, Mahomes Rodgers Burrow Herbert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's not an nfl issue it's an owner issue. The owners put pressure on the coaches to play them before they are ready. Very few if any have a vet to sit behind for at least a year to learn and adjust to the game. The Panthers would benefit from having a serviceable veteran that would allow them to sit their next rookie. Had they done that last season maybe things would look different. 
    • My dude, why do you keep doing things like this?  I don't take joy in questioning anyone else's intelligence or reading comprehension skills, but you keep doing things like things, and I can't let such asinine responses go without calling them out, it's just not in me to do that. LITERALLY in the very first sentence of the post you quoted, I straight up acknowledge and accept that you would take the QB there if you can't trade down, which in turn, is an acknowledgement of how you view them as an elite prospect. Period. There is no debating that, I literally right there in the first sentence did EXACTLY what you are claiming here that I can't do.   BEYOND any of that, you're still completely ignoring my question to you, which is a completely valid question in a discussion such as this right now, let's recap shall we........ The generic question is what to do with the #1 pick.  It's near unanimous that we use it to trade down, great, since we all agree, we can move past it in regards to the current discussion, as it's a hypothetical that requires another team's help to happen.   So we move onto the question of what we would do with the #1 pick if we have to make the selection there, great, simple, easy peasy, on the same page still. You have said you'd take a QB, I disagree, but numerous times have acknowledge you and some others feel that way (even though you bafflingly thing I haven't, disagreeing with someone isn't refusing to acknowledge their view). In the last 28 years the only positions to go #1 overall have been QB, DE, and OT.  I've clearly explained why I don't see any of those positions making sense for the Panthers, in our current state, to take in this draft, with this draft class.  Because of that, you still have to make a selection, you don't get to pass on making a pick. So I said I would take T-Mac with a full explanation (numerous times) as to why I view him as the prospect to take compared to the other options.  To which you deride and question my football intelligence solely for saying I'd take a WR #1 overall when you don't have a QB. I then ask you a simple question, which you refuse to answer solely on the basis of you saying you'd go with the QB.  You can't attack someone for saying they'd take a WR there and then refuse to answer the question of who you would take instead if you couldn't take a QB. Because there is a very real possibility that the Panthers will look at the QB's and agree with me (and many others) that there isn't a QB that is worth the risk taking at #1 overall and they end up unable to trade back and have to make a pick there and won't go with a QB because of their grades on this class.   Which again, is my question to you, in THAT scenario, who are you drafting 1st overall if it's not a QB? It's a simple question, and answering it doesn't mean you don't believe in the QB's at that spot in the slightest, or even that I'm not accepting of your views on the QB's in this class.  
    • It is primarily the fault of the NFL who chooses to use college football as a minor league.
×
×
  • Create New...