Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What’s your 2023 QB big board (including Corral)


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, saX man said:

1A/B/C: Stroud/Young/Levis

2: Hendon Hooker

3: Michael Penix Jr

4: Tanner McKee

5: Grayson McCall

6: Matt Corral…he’s kind of on Jaren Hall’s level for me

7: Cameron Ward (should stay one more year and keep it going, on a great trajectory)

 

Someone does not like them some Matt Corral. Oof. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, year of the snitch said:

#1: Stroud - he does not look like any of the previous OSU QB's, he's going to put this stereo type to bed. Tall, throws dimes, reminds me of Herbert.

#2: Hooker - age seems to be his only issue which I don't find to be much of an issue. He may require a situation that tailors to his game which is a hard ask - but could be worth the scheming to allow him to succeed. Reminds me baby of Cam.

#3: Wilson - I really like Bryce, he is a true escape artist, knows the game really well, never scared, he takes huge hits all the time and just keeps going. My only knock on him is that he obviously has great weapons, but his line is even better, They allow him so much time to get creative and allow receivers to get open. We have a great line but this is the NFL, he's not gonna get 20 seconds to throw the ball and wait for DB's to get tired. Reminds me of Russell Wilson.

#4: Levis - Levis might be really good, he's got some accuracy issues but definitely seems like a project worth investing in. He's big, fits the mold of what has been successful at the QB position. Don't wanna say he reminds me of Josh Allen, maybe like a better Blake Bortles. Playoff Bortles.

#5: Matt Corral - I don't even think I have Matt at 5, there are better prospects. I saw Matt play in the NFL, he unfortunately does not have it. I wanted him to succeed very much, he's from my area and seems like a great dude. His debut was really weak and with the foot / leg injuries back to back, I don't ever see him breaking out.

When was that because we missed it? Do you mean with NFL players around him? That may be 10% correct at best. You didn't see Matt Corral with the first or second string on purpose. They didn't plan to play him this year, he wanted to play, they called him a "developmental pick" in the press conference directly after the draft. 

Do any of those QBs careers so far match up to Matt Corral's? Completion percentage? Mobility? Like PJ Corral stays accurate on the run. The guy runs like a running back. He's putting on weight, working out at BofA as we speak. 

Stroud isn't as mobile as Corral and Young could be but he's 2" 15lbs shorter than Matt when he came into the league.

This QB class has two frontrunner QBs that may ultimately drop because of that mistrust.

The only one who can match up well with Corrals skill set is Levis. A true dual threat in his own right and heavy enough to back it up.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed out on replying to some of the tanking conversation. (I tend to lurk without posting most of the time.) But this topic brought that idea back to mind and I wanted to chime in.

I know all fans of all teams want their team to win - obviously. It's simply the method of seeing that come to fruition that differs.

Personally, I think it's foolish to ever deliberately "tank" for the prospects of *potentially* getting a better player at a marginally higher draft slot. The draft is such an absolutely unpredictable crap-shoot that to lose intentionally - via roster utilization and/or coaching, not only undermines the blood, sweat and tears of the players under your stewardship, but it guarantees you absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a student of draft history to see the obvious uncertainty of every draft that has ever taken place. They're all littered with high-end, "can't miss" busts.

And that doesn't even consider the idea that the sport of football and its participants are fueled by an intense competitive spirit. What are you doing to that fire by any "efforts" to undermine that? What are you doing to player morale, to the sense of team and dedication that will ultimately be required to win once you have all the pieces in place? No team is flawless. All teams are, to a certain extent, a continuous work-in-progress. You do the BEST you can with what you've got, let the results tell their own story and hope to get the best players you can with the resources you acquire as a result. Anything else is pathetic imho.

Rant aside, and more to the topic at hand, I really like Young, despite his size. His awareness and decision making are the best of the bunch in my view, and while his size is not ideal, he has that *it* factor to my eyes. We may not have the opportunity to consider drafting him, but he'd be my pick if he were available. And I still think we've got to give Corral a real shot as well. He was thrown to the wolves with little preparation by a coaching staff that treated him as an afterthought rather than the 3rd round pick (with trade compensation) that he is. I never understood why he wasn't given more special attention, other than Rhule just doing Rhule things.

But I'm still hopeful that this season has some magic in it that makes talk of an early draft pick moot. The guys clearly want to play for Wilks - he's a leader of men, and that goes a long way. The team has some soft spots, but if we see a few more efforts like last Sunday, there's no reason we can't be in the conversation to win this year's poor NFC South. As a fan, I just want to see wins. The draft will sort itself out at draft time.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

When was that because we missed it? Do you mean with NFL players around him? That may be 10% correct at best. You didn't see Matt Corral with the first or second string on purpose. They didn't plan to play him this year, he wanted to play, they called him a "developmental pick" in the press conference directly after the draft. 

Do any of those QBs careers so far match up to Matt Corral's? Completion percentage? Mobility? Like PJ Corral stays accurate on the run. The guy runs like a running back. He's putting on weight, working out at BofA as we speak. 

Stroud isn't as mobile as Corral and Young could be but he's 2" 15lbs shorter than Matt when he came into the league.

This QB class has two frontrunner QBs that may ultimately drop because of that mistrust.

The only one who can match up well with Corrals skill set is Levis. A true dual threat in his own right and heavy enough to back it up.

Corral was getting caught from behind by DL that work at foot locker right now during preseason. His mobility and running won’t translate to the league. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, didn't people say pretty much the same thing about Fields?

Definitely a lesser extent than the likes of cardale Jones and Haskins, but it was still mostly a one read, read option offense.

CJ Stroud has honestly been one of the more impressive passers I've seen in college football in a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Man I must have been watching the wrong game. He looked raw, somewhat goofy, and inaccurate. Perhaps I picked an off day. 
 

I look forward to watching more. Any particular games that stick out? 

Yeah, that's how he looked to me in the 2 games of his I watched. Granted, the Kentucky oline is not very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RJK said:

Corral was getting caught from behind by DL that work at foot locker right now during preseason. His mobility and running won’t translate to the league. 

Not enough data to back up that claim. 
 

Also there are plenty of freak athlete big dudes who just don’t football well enough to make it in the league, foot locker career or not. 
 

Judging Corral off last preseason is incomplete and shortsighted to say the least. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

I missed out on replying to some of the tanking conversation. (I tend to lurk without posting most of the time.) But this topic brought that idea back to mind and I wanted to chime in.

I know all fans of all teams want their team to win - obviously. It's simply the method of seeing that come to fruition that differs.

Personally, I think it's foolish to ever deliberately "tank" for the prospects of *potentially* getting a better player at a marginally higher draft slot. The draft is such an absolutely unpredictable crap-shoot that to lose intentionally - via roster utilization and/or coaching, not only undermines the blood, sweat and tears of the players under your stewardship, but it guarantees you absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a student of draft history to see the obvious uncertainty of every draft that has ever taken place. They're all littered with high-end, "can't miss" busts.

And that doesn't even consider the idea that the sport of football and its participants are fueled by an intense competitive spirit. What are you doing to that fire by any "efforts" to undermine that? What are you doing to player morale, to the sense of team and dedication that will ultimately be required to win once you have all the pieces in place? No team is flawless. All teams are, to a certain extent, a continuous work-in-progress. You do the BEST you can with what you've got, let the results tell their own story and hope to get the best players you can with the resources you acquire as a result. Anything else is pathetic imho.

Rant aside, and more to the topic at hand, I really like Young, despite his size. His awareness and decision making are the best of the bunch in my view, and while his size is not ideal, he has that *it* factor to my eyes. We may not have the opportunity to consider drafting him, but he'd be my pick if he were available. And I still think we've got to give Corral a real shot as well. He was thrown to the wolves with little preparation by a coaching staff that treated him as an afterthought rather than the 3rd round pick (with trade compensation) that he is. I never understood why he wasn't given more special attention, other than Rhule just doing Rhule things.

But I'm still hopeful that this season has some magic in it that makes talk of an early draft pick moot. The guys clearly want to play for Wilks - he's a leader of men, and that goes a long way. The team has some soft spots, but if we see a few more efforts like last Sunday, there's no reason we can't be in the conversation to win this year's poor NFC South. As a fan, I just want to see wins. The draft will sort itself out at draft time.

Thoughtful post. Post more often!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Not enough data to back up that claim. 
 

Also there are plenty of freak athlete big dudes who just don’t football well enough to make it in the league, foot locker career or not. 
 

Judging Corral off last preseason is incomplete and shortsighted to say the least. 

Passing on QB prospects due to holding out hope for Corral would be flat out insane 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even 49ers/Dophins type offense requires a quarterback to complete high school throws, which Bryce simply can't do. 
    • The bolded paragraph basically confirms that our players know what most fans have also known for quite sometime: Bryce is the problem.   Panthers lose, but there’s a different vibe since Andy Dalton replaced Bryce Young Joseph Person CHARLOTTE, N.C. — When Joe Burrow and a desperate Cincinnati Bengals team were putting up touchdowns quicker than department store Christmas displays in late September, you figured the Carolina Panthers were headed toward Blowout City. Down 31-14 late in the third quarter, another Panthers team — like the one from a few weeks ago — would have folded up, eaten a 30-point loss and tried to beat the traffic out of Bank of America Stadium. Instead, the Panthers scored on consecutive possessions, handed Burrow his first interception of the season and pulled within a touchdown midway through the fourth quarter. And while the Panthers didn’t hand Burrow a fourth loss to start the season, they at least kept things competitive Sunday before falling 34-24. And when you’re coming off a 2-15 season and just benched last year’s No. 1 pick two games into this one, that will have to suffice. “I don’t call it a moral victory. A loss is a loss,” cornerback Jaycee Horn said. “But at the end of the day, you could feel the vibe that we’re getting better as a team. Can’t deny that. We’re gonna find a way to shake back and go out there next week and get a dub.” Carolina coach Dave Canales speaks with QB Andy Dalton during the game Sunday as Bryce Young looks on. (Bob Donnan / Imagn Images_ The most obvious difference is at quarterback, where Andy Dalton wasn’t as on-point as he was in Vegas but still turned in a “solid day” at the office, as first-year coach Dave Canales called it. Canales isn’t asking Dalton to do too much: Get the Panthers in the right play, try to hit the first read and don’t put the ball in jeopardy. Whether it’s lingering effects from his 62-sack rookie season or something else, those are things Bryce Young wasn’t doing as the Panthers started 0-2 while being outscored 73-13. And when the quarterback isn’t playing well, it has a way of sucking the energy out of an entire organization. But there was a different feeling Sunday at Bank of America Stadium, where the Panthers went toe-to-toe with an AFC team that has a franchise quarterback and playoff expectations. Also of note: No fans were seen with bags over their heads or heard chanting for the owner to sell the team. Progress. “I think something flipped,” right guard Robert Hunt said. “We’re just trying to win some games. Guys are clicking. We never felt out of it today. We were saying the whole time, ‘We’re about to go down and win this game.’ Unfortunately, it didn’t go our way.” What flipped is the quarterback, though players don’t want to call out Young because they like him and voted him a team captain less than a month ago. Plus, they might need him if something in Dalton’s 36-year-old body stretches or snaps the way it did Sunday for veteran linebackers Shaq Thompson and Josey Jewell. But Canales has indicated he plans to ride Dalton as long as he’s producing, much like rookie receiver Xavier Legette rode his imaginary horse — inspired by his actual horse named Dolla Bill — back to the sideline Sunday following his first career touchdown. Legette’s performance against the Bengals personified where the Panthers (1-3) are nearly a quarter of a season into the Canales/Dan Morgan era. The former South Carolina wideout, drafted with the last pick in the first round, caught six passes (matching his total from the first three games) for 66 yards and the TD. But he also had two of the handful of drops by Panthers receivers and tight ends, a couple of which came in key spots (Diontae Johnson in the end zone on the first drive; Feleipe Franks on a fake punt that would have extended a drive). The roster might not be teeming with Pro Bowlers, but there is talent here. Like Legette, it’s about cleaning up the details. “I wouldn’t really say it’s a healthy loss because the two drops that I had, that’s the difference between winning and losing,” Legette said. “If I would have made those plays, we would have been able to stay on the field and maybe get a touchdown to win the game.” GO DEEPER Bengals top Panthers 34-24 for first win of season: Takeaways There were other examples of those little things that usually separate the winners and losers on Sundays: • Shoddy tackling on a pair of Cincinnati touchdown receptions, including a pitiful showing on a Ja’Marr Chase 63-yarder in which Xavier Woods, Charles Harris and Troy Hill all whiffed. • The offensive line failing to deliver Chuba Hubbard into the end zone on three tries from 2 yards or closer (sandwiched around that fade to Johnson on second-and-goal). • Pass rushers that never sacked Burrow and barely made him sweat, the one exception being a Jadeveon Clowney pressure that forced Burrow into a poor throw that Woods intercepted. • Nick Thurman jumping offside on third-and-4 after the Panthers had climbed back within a TD. • All those drops, including two deep balls that ticked off Johnson’s fingertips. “I’ve just gotta have those, gotta come down with those,” Johnson said. “It comes down to the details. What could I have done better to get more separation or (win) at the catch point?” The sooner the Panthers hammer out the fine points, the better. Because while there are some upcoming games they could steal, beginning next weekend in Chicago, the post-Munich portion of the schedule could get ugly, especially if the injury news on Thompson is bad. In the meantime, the uber-positive Canales will keep preaching process … and progress. That was his message Sunday. “For me just talking to the team, encouraged that our football continues to improve,” he said. “But we’ve gotta finish and we have to execute. And it all starts with me as the head coach.” It starts with the head coach and the quarterback. And if nothing else, the Panthers are in better shape than they were two weeks ago. Dalton was a workmanlike 25-of-40 for 220 yards with two touchdowns and an interception. The pick came in the first half when Trey Hendrickson beat Ikem Ekwonu and hit Dalton’s arm as he was releasing. It also looked like Dalton could have stepped up more in the pocket; Canales said he’d have to see the film. Like many of his teammates, Dalton said the mojo around the team is different, even if it didn’t result in a win Sunday. “I definitely feel it. I think just what this team has been through the last several years, I mean, we were in this game until the very end,” Dalton said. “I think for us, it’s like, all right, how can we change that? When we get to be in these moments where we have a chance to win — go drive down and win the game.” (Top photo of Diontae Johnson: Matt Kelley / Getty Images)
    • Holy poo, 2023 may be our worst draft ever.
×
×
  • Create New...