Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: if Wilks does a good job...

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Good god poo fug. We win one little game against a crappy team and half this board acts like we're a player or two and a coach away from the SB. Take a step back, psychos.

Television Stop GIF by RTL II

#dejavu

Who is saying this? I think people are just excited to see the team okay with some form of heart instead of getting our teeth kicked up and down the field. Nothing wromh with a little hope and being happy for once on a Monday. I'm not in the "let's tank" for a QB that may or may not pan out well though so I guess I'm biased as I would like to see us win as many as we can and still under the hope if we get a QB they will pan out great even though it might not be the number 1 overall pick.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted

I'd be happy with him as defensive coordinator but don't want him as head coach. I can't stand the conservative game management. He doesn't play to win. That works if the other team beats themselves, but you're not going to consistently win that way and you're going to gradually undermine your team's confidence. I think we're just seeing how historically terrible Rhule was that Wilks' basic competence looks so good. But we can do better.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beast_3000 Proficient

Beast_3000

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Jmac said:

If he binds this team together and wins 5 or 6 more games, should he be retained as HC.

Sure that would kill the 'tank' crowd, but is he somehow gets P.J to be the guy this year and team responds positively, what should they do?

Opinions please...

If he can turn this team around and win another 6 games he will have gone 7 - 4 without the benefit of putting his own footprint on the team. If he hires the right offensive mind  and QB coach he should be given every chance to succeed. Hiring a different head  coach could lead us right back down a negative path.  It wouldn’t make sense to change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

People in here stating it would take a couple of playoff wins.... If Wilks gets a single playoff win with this roster... it is a no brainer to keep him. 

Fug that. If he even MAKES the playoffs, it's a no brainer to keep him. After everything that's gone on to start the year and all the distractions and drama, if Steve Wilks willed this team (whether it be by winning a bad division or not) into the playoffs, you give that man the benefit of the doubt and at bare minimum give him one more year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...