Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have Pro Bowlers on this roster?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would say ‘locks’ for this team are 

 

Hekker- has been a great punter for this team, good accuracy and plenty of leg

 Brown- has to be one of the top interior DL in the league. Playing VERY well and has shed the bust label

 

maybe category

Ekwonu- this young man has a very bright future, he’s playing at a high level as a rookie

Burns- sacks will have to pick up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

I would say ‘locks’ for this team are 

 

Hekker- has been a great punter for this team, good accuracy and plenty of leg

 Brown- has to be one of the top interior DL in the league. Playing VERY well and has shed the bust label

 

maybe category

Ekwonu- this young man has a very bright future, he’s playing at a high level as a rookie

Burns- sacks will have to pick up

Burns has 5 sacks in 7 games.  That pace will be a career high for the (already been to the) pro-bowler.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Killah_Ray said:

Hekker, Brown, and Burns look like good bets.

 

Only one I'm iffy on is Brown and that's only because he isn't a well known name I feel like amongst casual fans...

2-5 teams don’t have pro bowlers. Every one stop with the homer bullshit.  The worst team in the league and some of y’all are saying 3-4 players?? Hahahahaha. What in the actual fug. Good teams rarely get 3 much less 4. 
 

y’all get one win and to think we have the best players 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

maybe burns. Mayyybe. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...