Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don’t touch the Defense


Panther53521
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

Don't touch the Defense!! Wilks put his finger prints all over this...just shows what a loser snow was and his college scheme...we all new the talent was underperforming under him...

The Wilks zone with the Snow college front made no sense haha. Linebackers were lost in that mush. Looked more pro today even with missing Horn and Chinn

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

The Wilks zone with the Snow college front made no sense haha. Linebackers were lost in that mush. Looked more pro today even with missing Horn and Chinn

LBs been lost for a long time....you could see a distinct turnaround in the D tho...i mean this was Brady.... maybe the Giselle coochie is occupying his mind...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Panther53521 said:

Get back Horn healthy, find a MLB in the draft, but don’t trade, release or anything else on the defense side. I know Brady was off and his WRs could catch anything, but I like the way this defense is playing right now.

on the offense, do what ever you want, trade, release, or dump players. But DONT TOUCH THE DEFENSE.

I'd like to see Brandon Smith get reps at MLB. He has all the tools to be a star player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

You want your MLB to basically be QB of the defense though. I'd currently take Luvu for that role, I like Littleton as well for guys that can read the offense

...thats what was so crazy good about Luke...qb on the D and Cam qb on the O.... Riv was such a stone head to not be able to take advantage of that...Shaq amounts to the left strap on Lukes jock...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...thats what was so crazy good about Luke...qb on the D and Cam qb on the O.... Riv was such a stone head to not be able to take advantage of that...Shaq amounts to the left strap on Lukes jock...

Yeah every other play i'm like fug Shaq, then he makes a play. I think he was just asked to do too much for too much money. He's just a solid Sam or Will, not the face of the defense. I already like Luvu and Littleton more for cheap

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I have to admit if I were the GM, two first for Burns would be very tempting.  Especially given that he is going to cost us a lot of money before much longer.  But I understand the arguments for keeping him.  

I don't even like this draft class so f that. Hypothetically sounds nice but what 2 players do you think could make that kind of impact between picks 12 and 32? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I don't even like this draft class so f that. Hypothetically sounds nice but what 2 players do you think could make that kind of impact between picks 12 and 32? 

Well, I am not sure they would have both been in this draft class, it wasn't confirmed whether it was two this year, or one and one next year.  But just saying I would be tempted, not that I would actually pull the trigger.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I have to admit if I were the GM, two first for Burns would be very tempting.  Especially given that he is going to cost us a lot of money before much longer.  But I understand the arguments for keeping him.  

Former agent with the truth.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, I am not sure they would have both been in this draft class, it wasn't confirmed whether it was two this year, or one and one next year.  But just saying I would be tempted, not that I would actually pull the trigger.  

Yeah it's hypothetical, but I don't really like anybody on a Burns replacement level. DE's are hard to find, especially a guy like him who is very mature for his age and probably can play another 8 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

You want your MLB to basically be QB of the defense though. I'd currently take Luvu for that role, I like Littleton as well for guys that can read the offense

I feel you but Smith knock coming out was the game slowing down. I know its preseason but he was all over the field during that stint.  His natural position  is MLB and it looks like he knows how to use his athleticism. Luvu makes sense too but I think Smith needs some looks at that spot this year. Spot reps. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lurk21 said:

I feel you but Smith knock coming out was the game slowing down. I know its preseason but he was all over the field during that stint.  His natural position  is MLB and it looks like he knows how to use his athleticism. Luvu makes sense too but I think Smith needs some looks at that spot this year. Spot reps. 

I didn't know he played MLB, he seems smart so I'm for it. Seems like we've been using him in special teams and edge blitzes during preseason so who knows. I hope Wilks gets a chance to put these guys in position for success because Rhule was just throwing poo at the wall 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He made some excellent throws but he always has made some excellent throws here and there. I don't know what to think, which is what I was apprehensive about. Is he going to have a decent downfield game? Because okay Legette dropped one, but someone was giving stats prior to the bye or during it where he had two downfield completions and one of them was the jump ball that is just launched and fingers are crossed that our guy comes down with it, and yesterday we saw that again. The Russell Wilson school of downfield passing.  I don't feel like that is sustainable, but at the same time you have to do Something to make the defense understand they have to defend that downfield throws. Like i said, confused.  I guess I'm going to review the game for myself and look closely at his mechanics and stuff because if he actually fixed that stuff it explains the better throws. And that has been my biggest objection, or what I see as the thing that makes or breaks his chances, that unorthodox dropback and tippy toe action and not having his feet set which limits velocity etc etc. 
    • The negative Nancy in me (or objective?) says that they had a bye week to prepare for the Chiefs. However, it’s one thing to have a good plan and it’s another to actually execute it. For all the flack he’s received (from me as well), Bryce seemingly has put his head down and worked his tail off and his play is giving me hope. The first 18-game Bryce showed no progression whatsoever. He gets benched, comes back, and has shown steady progress every week he has started. I think I’m starting to see what the Bryce lovers and unconditional defenders were saying all along, and I hope he can show that on a regular basis for the sake of our QB1 position. 
    • Yeah, we could still very well end up 4-13 with the 2nd pick.   I think LVR has the inside track for 1, with only a JAX team as a team on docket that could be beatable.    
×
×
  • Create New...