Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade CMC = most rushing yards on the year


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

This. No actual practices and 2 walk thrus.

10 yd avg. GTFOH that he was the problem.

I dont see too many bright people saying he was the problem, but stop being butt hurt about a RB who is 2 years away from being useless. 

We were not wining poo with him now or at any point in his career, be happy we got some draft picks for him instead of getting nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

I dont see too many bright people saying he was the problem, but stop being butt hurt about a RB who is 2 years away from being useless. 

We were not wining poo with him now or at any point in his career, be happy we got some draft picks for him instead of getting nothing. 

He wasn't the problem he was just overvalued.  The contract was way too big for a RB, especially one with an injury history.  We got value for him and helped relieve our cap from years 2024 and on.  He is just crying because his guy got traded and our offense looked better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

He wasn't the problem he was just overvalued.  The contract was way too big for a RB, especially one with an injury history.  We got value for him and helped relieve our cap from years 2024 and on.  He is just crying because his guy got traded and our offense looked better.

I don't think we got enough and we are balking at 2 firsts for Jag ass Burns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I hate we only have Bozeman for one year....

Well, he has a few more games hopefully to audition for a long term gig. Today went as well as expected. A few more and stay healthy, sign him before the end of the year if he would do that. I mean it's not like the ravens had some meh running game with him and they didn't maintain once he left. Oh wait they did dominate on the ground with him and not so much now. Hmmmmm. But coincidence for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

I don't think we got enough and we are balking at 2 firsts for Jag ass Burns

We wanted a first or multiple picks.  We got a 2, 3, 4, 5 which is multiple and equals a 1st easily.  You just aren't going to get the same return for a RB as you are a pass rusher in today's NFL even an elite one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We wanted a first or multiple picks.  We got a 2, 3, 4, 5 which is multiple and equals a 1st easily.  You just aren't going to get the same return for a RB as you are a pass rusher in today's NFL even an elite one.

Dude because the niners will win

The 2nd is a 3rd

The 3rd is a 4th

The 4th is a 5th

So we might get a good starter

A serviceable starter and a cut player.

That's not superstar replacement 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Dude because the niners will win

The 2nd is a 3rd

The 3rd is a 4th

The 4th is a 5th

So we might get a good starter

A serviceable starter and a cut player.

That's not superstar replacement 

and their 1st (which is what we were asking for) would be a 2nd.  A LB/C/RB in the 3rd can absolutely be a starter.  Any position drafted in the 2nd can also.  Then you have depth which is something we need.  We can also use the picks to trade up if needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The trade below a few years ago was so bad and in favor of the Ravens, tf was Arizona doing Cardinals receive: Marquise Brown and 3rd round pick  Ravens receive: 23rd overall pick 
    • keaton is a former Catamount.  The list I saw had only 2--Sanker and Emmanwori.  But I do recall hearing about Bowman. The theory that we are looking for specific hybrid safeties is upheld by this.  Keaton fits the "type" who can play zone or deep and in the box.  "He's a physical player with a high motor and a nose for the football. He has a good understanding of zone coverage and can play in the box as a force defender. Keaton is a leader and has earned a single-digit jersey number at Temple, a tradition reserved for team leaders." At WCU, he averaged 6.5 tackles per game, leading the team before transferring. Sanker has special teams abilities and a high football IQ.  He can cover TEs and RBs and keeps the play in front.  He would be a nice fit as a depth player.  I did not know they met with Bowman at the SR bowl.  He is more of a free safety who struggles in tackling/run support, but that is not to say he is not versatile within his capabilities. Stark is a SS who is a brutal hitter, but I don't see his hybrid qualities--they met with him at the Combine when everyone was in the building, but that was nearly 2 months ago and I don't think there has been contact since. Emmanwori is who they would love to have in my opinion.  NFL Draft Buzz:  "His ability to play in the box, handle man coverage responsibilities, and deliver bone-crushing hits makes him an ideal fit for defenses that ask their safeties to wear multiple hats." So it seems they are looking for a type.  The Keaton pick is intriguing to me because he is a sleeper who would clearly be there in round 5 or later.  They seem attracted to his characteristics, and he is a thumper who can play deep.  To me, the fact that they want 2 hybrid safeties of a certain type is rather obvious.  Maybe I am forcing a round peg into a square hole, but I love trying to see what skillsets teams value to guess draft picks.
    • Because it’s all bullshit and they know it’s bullshit. 
×
×
  • Create New...