Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offers for Burns


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

This is the same guy who has been melting down that we need to replace cmc with another star running back and then we proceeded to rush for 170+ yards with a 3rd rounder and 5th rounder.  

Dude those two guys don't replace Cmac

Just like our whole reciever room in 2015 couldn't replace one Steve Smith.

It's just a fact. That was the best run blocked game we've had in three years.

With Cmac I see the same mistake we made with Steve. If we had Steve in 15 we win the Superbowl fix or not. 

We had phucking Cotchery we now have phucking Foreman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/34884040/chicago-bears-trading-de-robert-quinn-eagles

 

I wonder if the eagles were a team that offered 2 first?

They did for my digging, *but it was 24 and 25 1sts.

_______________________________________________________________

Look Im not a Burns fangirl or nothing. Cat69 is right, the guy never has had 10 or more sacks, just facts. Plus his rush D is sus. It took him 4 years to learn how to eat, btw he looks slimmer than TC now.....

The good- dat age.....4 years starting in the NFL and hes only 24.....thats pre-prime for some.....Plus he has played better this year and improved some each yr.

Im just not a fan of 30per, nope, no chance. After the 5th year, you can tag him for the next 3 welllll under 30. Trade him among during for two 1sts, two 3rds, and cherry on top.....just like CMC let some other team pay him..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

we do have 1 roster spot open, but im assuming we are saving that for Chinn or Darnold. 

Put Baker on IR and give this kid a shot. I thought he was worth drafting and one spot the panthers need is DE. 

Now we just need @4Corners to come in here and poo on the guy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Baker is pretty much ready to play. To IR him would get us in hot water to put it mildly.

fug Bakers feelings.

Hes got a real torn ligament. The pass 2 games and 4 IR ones put the panthers firmly in the 5th pick compensation rather than a 4th....plus saves a few bucks as well.

Take another x-ray and get your doc to say "you pushed to fast baker, suffered a set-back and you need a minimum of 3 weeks rest". 

Done.

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's not an nfl issue it's an owner issue. The owners put pressure on the coaches to play them before they are ready. Very few if any have a vet to sit behind for at least a year to learn and adjust to the game. The Panthers would benefit from having a serviceable veteran that would allow them to sit their next rookie. Had they done that last season maybe things would look different. 
    • My dude, why do you keep doing things like this?  I don't take joy in questioning anyone else's intelligence or reading comprehension skills, but you keep doing things like things, and I can't let such asinine responses go without calling them out, it's just not in me to do that. LITERALLY in the very first sentence of the post you quoted, I straight up acknowledge and accept that you would take the QB there if you can't trade down, which in turn, is an acknowledgement of how you view them as an elite prospect. Period. There is no debating that, I literally right there in the first sentence did EXACTLY what you are claiming here that I can't do.   BEYOND any of that, you're still completely ignoring my question to you, which is a completely valid question in a discussion such as this right now, let's recap shall we........ The generic question is what to do with the #1 pick.  It's near unanimous that we use it to trade down, great, since we all agree, we can move past it in regards to the current discussion, as it's a hypothetical that requires another team's help to happen.   So we move onto the question of what we would do with the #1 pick if we have to make the selection there, great, simple, easy peasy, on the same page still. You have said you'd take a QB, I disagree, but numerous times have acknowledge you and some others feel that way (even though you bafflingly thing I haven't, disagreeing with someone isn't refusing to acknowledge their view). In the last 28 years the only positions to go #1 overall have been QB, DE, and OT.  I've clearly explained why I don't see any of those positions making sense for the Panthers, in our current state, to take in this draft, with this draft class.  Because of that, you still have to make a selection, you don't get to pass on making a pick. So I said I would take T-Mac with a full explanation (numerous times) as to why I view him as the prospect to take compared to the other options.  To which you deride and question my football intelligence solely for saying I'd take a WR #1 overall when you don't have a QB. I then ask you a simple question, which you refuse to answer solely on the basis of you saying you'd go with the QB.  You can't attack someone for saying they'd take a WR there and then refuse to answer the question of who you would take instead if you couldn't take a QB. Because there is a very real possibility that the Panthers will look at the QB's and agree with me (and many others) that there isn't a QB that is worth the risk taking at #1 overall and they end up unable to trade back and have to make a pick there and won't go with a QB because of their grades on this class.   Which again, is my question to you, in THAT scenario, who are you drafting 1st overall if it's not a QB? It's a simple question, and answering it doesn't mean you don't believe in the QB's at that spot in the slightest, or even that I'm not accepting of your views on the QB's in this class.  
    • It is primarily the fault of the NFL who chooses to use college football as a minor league.
×
×
  • Create New...