Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offers for Burns


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

*sighs* If someone offered two firsts for Burns, you check with your sources around the league until you identify one who confirms from the team that offered. Obviously, as the reporter you can't state which team, because that would come pretty close to outting your source with his own team. 

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you, or are you the sole arbiter of how the real world works?

Really?

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gucceland said:

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

That didnt happen.  Cmac went to the team after the rams game and said thats it I want out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

And on top of that, what would we do with a 1st round pick from the trade?

 

Immediately look for a pass rushing DE that we can only hope is as good as Burns.   Trading him makes absolutely no sense.

Yeah the caveat with that being that you don’t have to pay the draft pick 25+ million a year, which is what BB is going to be looking at here soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish our dumbass franchise would already commit to a full rebuild, since we badly need to do it. There is no way in hell Burns is signing a deal with us after his contract expires, unless we are offering him double the pay as the next closest team. Unless the 2 1st rounders were in the years 2025 or later, I don't understand how you turn down 2 first round picks for a guy that will be gone after next season...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

Again with the failed reading comprehension. You're just discrediting your own argument that Schefter isn't reporting credible information. They dealt McCaffrey, exactly as Shefter said for multiple picks.

Are you really not reading the stuff you're even quoting?

Then you can't even be bothered to write your own post, trying to be clever by parroting mine back at me. Dude. Stop. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Again with the failed reading comprehension. You're just discrediting your own argument that Schefter isn't reporting credible information. They dealt McCaffrey, exactly as Shefter said for multiple picks.

Are you really not reading the stuff you're even quoting?

Then you can't even be bothered to write your own post, trying to be clever by parroting mine back at me. Dude. Stop. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

the moronic aliases have come on strong since the rhule firing and cmac trade

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Let’s look at how replacing players has gone thus far in the Tepper Era:

QB: downgrade
RB: downgrade
WR: downgrade 
TE: downgrade
OL: push
DL: downgrade
LB: downgrade 
CB: downgrade
S: push

Yeah, more picks works out well. 

How about we try it with a real HC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Makes sense.  The more picks in 2023 the better.  I'm not talking rounds 4-7.  I am talking rounds 1-3.  These are the rounds where you can get starter talent. 

I am in agreement with a couple of the other posters.  If Philly is in the Burns sweepstakes than their two first round picks puts them at the head of the line. 

The other players you mentioned we MUST get good value for them.  I don't want to see DJ or Horn go for any less than what we drafted them plus some.  Moore and Horn are 1st rounders.  I want 1st rounders and at minimum one additional day 2 pick. 

If you are going to gut this team and rebuild.  Than, I would like most of those picks this year and some next.  

Just imagining our own 1st, Philly's two 1st, two additional 1st for Horn and DJ.  That's 5 first rounders.  Currently two 2nds, three 3rds (Horn and DJ) and our lower round picks.  You could take a couple of those 1st rounders, trade down for even more picks.  We would make a huge haul as long as Fitterer doesn't pull a Hurney with the 2nd rounders. 😁

That said we would be looking at another losing season in 2023 only because we have so many inexperienced players but going into 2024. Watch out.  

Yes, but it would be much more fun to watch than what we've had the past few years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After the Chiefs game a 6'5 X would really help in the Red zone. I would also love to add Slayton in FA 
    • But again, you can restock a defense through free agency much easier than offensive skill positions. Spend all our cap space on defense, take a true elite prospect who also happens to fit a position of need in T-Mac, and then use the rest of our picks on defense. Again, every season there’s a smattering of great DL, LB, and DB options in free agency, a Top 10 WR never hits free agency, ever.  The only way you get one is through the draft or giving up 1st round picks in a trade for one. If he’s there when we’re on the clock, he has to be the pick, he’s just that good.  
    • It must be an early Christmas for JT O'Sullivan having Thielen back so he could put a coal in Thielen's stocking every chance he gets.  Honestly, the biggest surprise is not so much the anticipation. There were those moments here and there last year as well. It's that even that one positive quality he had seemingly vanished his first two games to where it looked like it was all but over, only for it to start coming back some until you get exclamation points all over this game film. And some of those throws were under a lot of duress, something I feel is something new. Finally, those deeper shots are starting to land. Not all of them, but enough that defenses may have to start respecting them. No guarantees whether this will end up as more of anomaly but I certainly hope it isn't. The Green Bay game was a sampler of what BY could be. Against KC, we got a meal. If we could start getting these meals regularly, we might actually have something to work with here.
×
×
  • Create New...