Offers for Burns

[joemac]

37 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

Multiple Panthers reporters confirmed CMC wouldn't be traded for less than a 1st round pick too....

No they did not

[Gucceland]

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

*sighs* If someone offered two firsts for Burns, you check with your sources around the league until you identify one who confirms from the team that offered. Obviously, as the reporter you can't state which team, because that would come pretty close to outting your source with his own team. 

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you, or are you the sole arbiter of how the real world works?

Really?

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

[mrcompletely11]

38 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

Multiple Panthers reporters confirmed CMC wouldn't be traded for less than a 1st round pick too....

link?

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, Gucceland said:

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

That didnt happen.  Cmac went to the team after the rams game and said thats it I want out. 

[joemac]

16 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

And on top of that, what would we do with a 1st round pick from the trade?

 

Immediately look for a pass rushing DE that we can only hope is as good as Burns.   Trading him makes absolutely no sense.

Yeah the caveat with that being that you don’t have to pay the draft pick 25+ million a year, which is what BB is going to be looking at here soon. 

[OldhamA]

Hopefully this is just the negotiation stage of proceedings.

2 first round picks for Burns way exceeds his value - I'd jump all over that.

[PleaseCutStewart]

I wish our dumbass franchise would already commit to a full rebuild, since we badly need to do it. There is no way in hell Burns is signing a deal with us after his contract expires, unless we are offering him double the pay as the next closest team. Unless the 2 1st rounders were in the years 2025 or later, I don't understand how you turn down 2 first round picks for a guy that will be gone after next season...

[1of10Charnatives]

13 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

*sighs* same poo different player.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.   Adam Schefter

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you or are you still stuck to a "credible" reporters tit sucking down all the smoke screen.  

Really?

 

Again with the failed reading comprehension. You're just discrediting your own argument that Schefter isn't reporting credible information. They dealt McCaffrey, exactly as Shefter said for multiple picks.

Are you really not reading the stuff you're even quoting?

Then you can't even be bothered to write your own post, trying to be clever by parroting mine back at me. Dude. Stop. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

[mrcompletely11]

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Again with the failed reading comprehension. You're just discrediting your own argument that Schefter isn't reporting credible information. They dealt McCaffrey, exactly as Shefter said for multiple picks.

Are you really not reading the stuff you're even quoting?

Then you can't even be bothered to write your own post, trying to be clever by parroting mine back at me. Dude. Stop. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

the moronic aliases have come on strong since the rhule firing and cmac trade

[cmichd08]

19 hours ago, countryboi said:

It’s going to take at least 2 first round middle fingers. 

You can always get a good pass rusher with those picks, or even two of them with one of those picks and one outside the first round.

[Luciu5]

I'm fine with 2 firsts for Burns if one of them is top 15 in 2023.

[rayzor]

13 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Let’s look at how replacing players has gone thus far in the Tepper Era:

QB: downgrade
RB: downgrade
WR: downgrade 
TE: downgrade
OL: push
DL: downgrade
LB: downgrade 
CB: downgrade
S: push

Yeah, more picks works out well. 

How about we try it with a real HC?

[rayzor]

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Makes sense.  The more picks in 2023 the better.  I'm not talking rounds 4-7.  I am talking rounds 1-3.  These are the rounds where you can get starter talent. 

I am in agreement with a couple of the other posters.  If Philly is in the Burns sweepstakes than their two first round picks puts them at the head of the line. 

The other players you mentioned we MUST get good value for them.  I don't want to see DJ or Horn go for any less than what we drafted them plus some.  Moore and Horn are 1st rounders.  I want 1st rounders and at minimum one additional day 2 pick. 

If you are going to gut this team and rebuild.  Than, I would like most of those picks this year and some next.  

Just imagining our own 1st, Philly's two 1st, two additional 1st for Horn and DJ.  That's 5 first rounders.  Currently two 2nds, three 3rds (Horn and DJ) and our lower round picks.  You could take a couple of those 1st rounders, trade down for even more picks.  We would make a huge haul as long as Fitterer doesn't pull a Hurney with the 2nd rounders. 

That said we would be looking at another losing season in 2023 only because we have so many inexperienced players but going into 2024. Watch out.  

Yes, but it would be much more fun to watch than what we've had the past few years 

[Catsfan69]

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

So not a JAG. Which is what I was saying. He is excellent at a very desirable skill.

He's not excellent at rushing the passer.

9 sacks a year isn't excellent. 

15 to 17 a year are excellent.