Offers for Burns

[Krovvy]

The only way I would consider two firsts is if it was the Saints pick the Eagles own, and another first. Otherwise, I think it's going to be a wash with who we would draft with those picks. It would help secure the first overall pick, but I'm not certain we need any more help with that.

So, I don't think it would be worth trading Burns. Realistically, it will be hard to find a replacement via the draft. It could happen in free agency but will cost a huge premium unless the team can turn it around in a year to start luring in free agents that want to be on a competitive team.

However, it's possible the team thinks we still could win too many games this year, and if that's the case they'll definitely try and move Burns. Without him the defensive line will be completely inept, with limited pressure.

[stirs]

All depends on how we plan on using him next season.

He cannot be great in a 43, only show flashes.  In a 34, he is Von Miller.

In Panther land, under the Defense Dujour, he is good only part of the time.  He sucks when a 320 Tackle is run blocking.  So we need to make up our mind how we are gonna use him before labeling him, trading him or whatever.  Not sure why we are gonna trade guys on D until we have an idea the scheme for next season.

If we put in a 34 and have shipped Burns off, then we are searching again for an elusive player.  If we are gonna run a 43, then get the picks and don't look back

[rayzor]

2 firsts + more?

Gimme them picks!

[rayzor]

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

[Growl]

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

this is stupid

[mc52beast]

Hmm… just wondering what we’re going to keep that would entice a good HC candidate to even consider us.

[stirs]

3 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hmm… just wondering what we’re going to keep that would entice a good HC candidate to even consider us.

$$$$$

[Billy Love]

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

If we trade Burns imma riot

Don’t plan your riot for this Sunday at the stadium, they’ll be nobody there. 

[Billy Love]

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hmm… just wondering what we’re going to keep that would entice a good HC candidate to even consider us.

A nice contract and the ability to shop for your own players.

[Growl]

2 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

A nice contract and the ability to shop for your own players.

“well believe it or not, we actually had some good players. We thought you’d hate that though, so we got rid of them and figured you’d want to just hope for the best.”

[SmokinwithWilly]

18 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

You have to stop at some point since you don't want to have too many high picks coming up for contract at once. If we're stacking picks, I hope we go for Harbaugh. HC with experience which seems to be a Tepper requirement. Not too many young offensive minds with a lot of experience available. 

[rayzor]

21 minutes ago, Growl said:

this is stupid

So more picks is not better? Letting the new coach totally rebuild this team isn't better?

[TheRumGone]

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I don't know why you guys stay connected to these players....sure he's a good player, not great. But this team has STUNK with this current collection of guys. I know coaching has been absolutely atrocious and that's a big reason, but a new coaching staff is going to want to bring in their own players anyway. If the Panthers can get a haul for Burns, YOU TAKE IT. There will be a new collection of talented players to cheer for, hopefully a group that wins. 

If you read the rest of my posts in here you would know I’m good with taking a haul. Two firsts minimum. I’m just saying you can’t act like burns is easily replaced. He’s not. We could draft a bust.

[Shotgun]

21 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hmm… just wondering what we’re going to keep that would entice a good HC candidate to even consider us.

A stack of picks to do whatever they want with.