Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer


Panthering
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Khaki Lackey said:

Between Teddy's contract and picking up Sam's option...mind boggling moves.

Exactly! We had already agreed we overcommitted to Teddy but then we go and do the same thing with Darnold? It just made no sense. Moves like that make really iffy with Fitt and Tepp even with Rhule gone. 
 

Was there really no one in the room who thought it could be a bad idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they should send him packing at the tail end of the season.   I don’t think he deserves to stay here. 

Keeping him feels like keeping Rhule headed into this season. Pointless.  He has been too involved in this mess and somehow gets a pass from it all. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

This is what bad organizations do. The GM and the Coach should be on the same clock.

Scott should either be fired or he should be able to hire coach and gets as long as the coach does. 

My assumption is that is exactly what is going to happen 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did what I needed to see so I am willing to wait and see at this point...but it's too damn close still. He had a hand in a lot of bad here. Setting up for a good offseason is not only good but it was necessary. I expect to see another trade (Shaq) at some point but he has done well from what we know in the past 2 weeks. If they can avoid giving out stupid heavy backended deals to keep players happy to stay and just limp into the offseason then we should be in a solid spot to hire a competent HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Exactly! We had already agreed we overcommitted to Teddy but then we go and do the same thing with Darnold? It just made no sense. Moves like that make really iffy with Fitt and Tepp even with Rhule gone. 
 

Was there really no one in the room who thought it could be a bad idea?

To be fair, I believe it was Hurney who made the Teddy deal, not Fiterrer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JVic said:

"Collection of pics is equivalent to a late first" ...

Really?  Then you should now be able to trade them all to someone for a late first rounder.     

I believe he could, but I don’t see the need unless we’re moving up to select a QB who dropped and we didn’t get one with our first. 
 

I like the chances we hit on two starters with those picks. We’ll have the first pick or so in the second anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...