Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Its 100% a haul no mental gymnastics needed, if you can zoom out from how much CMC meant to you as a fan and look at it more in terms of NFL value.

I mean he is right.  The primary reason we traded CMC was draft capital.   We have very little to attract a HC.  We lacked it.  And we lacked it because of the moves of our front office. 

I mean, it is a haul to some extent.  But we needed that haul because we have been poorly run. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

"We weren't going to win with him" is a hell of a way to justify getting rid of every good player you have. Guess since we aren't going to win with any of the players next year, best to deal next April's first right now while it still has value.

That is what happens when a regime throws away seasons as often as ours does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

This trade is the NFL GM equivalent of making a bunch of bad financial decisions, so you have to take your best asset to the pawn shop and take what you can get.

People can do mental gymnastics about how a late 2nd and late 3rd is a "haul", but when you zoom out, this trade is really a capstone of a very poorly run team.

To be fair I think paying big money to one of the shortest shelf life positions in the NFL and running your entire offense through one guy is just as much to blame for the position we’re in as the trading away of draft capital.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Captroop said:

I'm also in a more positive mood, because I grabbed Chuba for my office fantasy team while my coworkers on the West Coast won't even know about the trade for another hour.

It think Foreman would be the better pickup for Fantasy, but I got to think there's a better option on your waivers than the lead back in the worst offense in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, firefox1234 said:

That is what happens when a regime throws away seasons as often as ours does.

That's why Stroud/Young has to be traded next October when the team is 0-7, and averages 64 yards of total offense. Because you're not gonna win with them, so may as well deal them for more draft picks you can use on players you won't win with, so you can trade them for future draft picks to get players you won't win with, and so on and so forth.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, joemac said:

You may not like the trade personally, but I don't see how you can say we got "hosed".  We got 4 high to mid level draft picks for our oft-injured, super high priced RB.  As I'm sure you know, its not that difficult to find a cheap, productive RB these days.  RB's today are complimentary pieces, not something you invest in or design your offense around.  2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks are nothing to sneeze at.  

They are not high level picks. They are at the bottom of each round. 

Most likely all will be jags or busts.

 

Jesus Christ

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

And what if the first round QB can't ever beat out Matt Corral?

Why in the world would that ever be the case though?  Corral looked utterly lost out there before he got hurt, and I am positive that either CJ Stroud or Bryce Young will come in Day 1 and QB circles around Corral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

People are finally realizing that regardless of today, the Carolina Panthers will never be a good team again. This franchise is destined for a 30-plus-game losing streak and the first 0-17 season ever. Probably two consecutive 0-17 seasons before they move.

LOL Jesus Christ dude.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean he is right.  The primary reason we traded CMC was draft capital.   We have very little to attract a HC.  We lacked it.  And we lacked it because of the moves of our front office. 

I mean, it is a haul to some extent.  But we needed that haul because we have been poorly run. 

The first overall pick will be enough to attract the coach.  CMC wasnt gonna be the reason someone came here.  Having a LT and a WR1 locked up long term to pair with the young guy of their choice will definitely attract one.  I think we'd have traded CMC even if we had all our picks, he didnt match up with our timeline and we needed to reset the books for 2024 and beyond.

Giving a new coach a full complement of picks is just another plus for them to be able to build out the roster how they want instead of being locked into something.

Edited by stan786
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...