Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok, so now that we know 100% that QB will be our pick in rd 1.. Let’s talk about our 2nd biggest need, WR. Who do we love in the 2nd?

panthersgreenville

By panthersgreenville,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
On 10/19/2022 at 9:10 AM, CRA said:

I'm not a big fan of moving up in drafts but if we owned the #1 pick? 

I'd be okay moving up from the 33rd spot if there was someone great in the end of the first or middle.  Using that 33rd pick plus something wouldn't be that massive of a cost. 

Its also worth getting that 5th-year option that comes with 1st round picks too 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

WR??? Teams that are the worst in the league 32-32 don’t have their 2nd biggest need at WR. Another massive homer thread. This teams sucks and needs major help everywhere. O line. LB. D line. TE. 

We need big boys on both lines. LB or DE is in my opinion the biggest need. 

We need major help at OL? Some depth and maybe a new C, but LT, RT, RG, and probably LG look set for next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

See I think we could. Trade down from number 1.

Take a pass rusher first then we can still get Hooker or the coastal kid and maybe a DT.

Then that kid competes with Golden Corral!!

That's a lot of value.

 They should definitely get a DE. They kind of painted themselves in a corner with the trade to pick up Corral. They basically bet that Corral would be better than the 60th-70th pick they'll give up this year. He's playing.

We shouldn't spend a high pick to compete with the guy whether deserved or undeserved, you had as QB1. They're much better off taking a chance on a QB early in the second round to duke it out with Corral.

Like I've said, IF they go first round QB it would be absolutely asinine to make him compete with Corral. What if he loses? That devalued your first rounder. QB is a choice and you have a backup. QB competitions seem amateurish. 

Every good team knows who their damn QB is, the last coach was the opposite, winging it, playing coy, wasting everyone's time. There aren't that many NFL level QBs that you can actually have a "competition".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

 They should definitely get a DE. They kind of painted themselves in a corner with the trade to pick up Corral. They basically bet that Corral would be better than the 60th-70th pick they'll give up this year. He's playing.

We shouldn't spend a high pick to compete with the guy whether deserved or undeserved, you had as QB1. They're much better off taking a chance on a QB early in the second round to duke it out with Corral.

Like I've said, IF they go first round QB it would be absolutely asinine to make him compete with Corral. What if he loses? That devalued your first rounder. QB is a choice and you have a backup. QB competitions seem amateurish. 

Every good team knows who their damn QB is, the last coach was the opposite, winging it, playing coy, wasting everyone's time. There aren't that many NFL level QBs that you can actually have a "competition".

You can hold how the old regime valued players vs the new one. It just doesn’t work that way. The Cards had a first round grade on Rosen and took Murray the next year at 1 with their new coach. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You can hold how the old regime valued players vs the new one. It just doesn’t work that way. The Cards had a first round grade on Rosen and took Murray the next year at 1 with their new coach. 

The next coach may love Corral. Young offensive mind with NFL experience as HC?!

Lane Kiffin. Don't speak too soon. THAT could happen.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

The next coach may love Corral. Young offensive mind with NFL experience as HC?!

Lane Kiffin. Don't speak too soon. THAT could happen.

That’s true, but sitting with the top pick and new coach usually means QB. Not saying it’s 100%, but it’s close. Now if we drop a few spots and miss on the Stroud/Young/Levis picks anything is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...