Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like Scott Fitterer will continue as Panthers GM in '23


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

They extended him because he had over 90 catches and over 1000 receiving yards in 2020 and was the best wide receiver we had on the roster.  Honestly, hindsight being 20/20 and all, it was a pretty smart move then

Except in reality. Where it wa always a ba idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

They extended him because he had over 90 catches and over 1000 receiving yards in 2020 and was the best wide receiver we had on the roster.  Honestly, hindsight being 20/20 and all, it was a pretty smart move then

For robbies looks, he is very smart......he knew when Sam Darnold came, his numbers would considerably drop, the result would also hurt his market value. 900 IQ ANderson then held out to get him a bag while coming off his best year. Super smart. He had Rhule in his corner and got 2 more years for 30............. but as you see, finnessererererer is gotten the blame for it.....

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And now it’s down to 15M after the trade. 

Cap space or effective cap space?  Cap space is 500k, effective cap space is about -16M.  We have our core players outside of a QB, who will be a rookie.  The rest of the contracts to round out the last 1/3 of the roster will be low end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Lolololol. Yeah no

So you honestly don’t think a 1000 yard receiver, which btw was Sams best receiver in NY, and had chemistry with him AND our glorious ex coach was positive Sam was going to be the Franchise QB of the future, to lock Robbie up for basically Pennie’s on the dollar compared to other #1 receivers?  Now we both know Robbie isn’t that but I’m trying to put myself in their shoes at the time.  Year 1 was outstanding, so they locked him up, I get that.  Sucks it went to poo after that but if you can see the future please give me the winning lottery number, I swear I’ll split it with you

Edited by HPPantherzfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Toomers is a damn godsend to this board.   He brings the heat.  

he knows the cap well, which is odd about him hung up on anderson not lower the cap next year. whatever past that with the other stuff. 

stbugs is good on cap stuff too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yeah, I just went over next year's roster and honestly the defense nearly set.  A few LBs and some backup safeties, that's it!  The hard part is the offense. Crazy to say but our OL is really good shape, just a couple of depth pieces.  This draft better be offense heavy.  Obviously QB1, WR2, TE1 and a LB.

We've got picks in rounds 1,2,4 and 5. Would be crazy to trade back from the 1st pick and miss out on Stroud. Trading back in the 2nd? I'm not close to having any clue if this draft is deep at WR/TE/ or LB. Should probably just take BPA's at these spots listed or DE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Cap space or effective cap space?  Cap space is 500k, effective cap space is about -16M.  We have our core players outside of a QB, who will be a rookie.  The rest of the contracts to round out the last 1/3 of the roster will be low end.

We have to extend Burns right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Cap space or effective cap space?  Cap space is 500k, effective cap space is about -16M.  We have our core players outside of a QB, who will be a rookie.  The rest of the contracts to round out the last 1/3 of the roster will be low end.

The effective cap space is what you need. 10M for picks. 7M for PS and IR, and in-season. Where are you going to improve with two high picks and a bunch of low picks and UDFAs While trying to find a LB, DE, DT, WR2-3, TE, C, and QB while trying to improve the worst team in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

We've got picks in rounds 1,2,4 and 5. Would be crazy to trade back from the 1st pick and miss out on Stroud. Trading back in the 2nd? I'm not close to having any clue if this draft is deep at WR/TE/ or LB. Should probably just take BPA's at these spots listed or DE

I'm going to see what happens first.  Trading back would be an option in the right scenario.  As long as we come out with a QB1, TE1 and a starting caliber MLB, I'll be happy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...