Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like Scott Fitterer will continue as Panthers GM in '23

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Move the Panthers to Raleigh Grand Master

Move the Panthers to Raleigh

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He is a gm cuck that agreed to a job with no power.   That’s best case scenario.    We need clean house.    There are a ton of poo moves he has made since he got hired.  If this was supposedly rhule then his ass better show tepper receipts that he was against it.  I mean trading for darnold and baker should be firing offenses on general principle.    And there are a ton more of bad moves

“GM Cuck” 

that’s a new one

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

No the cap is a myth, remember?  That's why Sean Payton left the team and it says 54 million in red there.

In reality, it really is… until there are penalties for continuing to push money down the road teams will continue doing it.

That’s one reason that I don’t worry about the cap anymore. It’s all bullshit…

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah well I don't give a flying fug about what anyone says about the future until it becomes the past. 

IDC who the fuging coach is now. We all know he has next to no ability to force any personnel move without Fitterer signing off on it. He isn't subordinate to anyone.

Pretty sure Fitterer and Wilks are gonna be collaborative...basically like a normal head coach-GM works rather than the Rhule "full power" bullsh-t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Am I reading the Saints cap correctly??!

bro they were like 90 million in the red during coofus 2020. Mickey is a cap wizard and smarter than anyone when it comes to it *but you have to pay up at some point...... Mick always bet on the cap increase and spending 20 million in the future than the now. If the cap gos up 5-9% each year its wiser to spend the future money cause its less % of the whole cap four years form now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Am I reading the Saints cap correctly??!

Lol, yes you are.  Remember how people keep saying the cap is a myth? Eh, it can be fudged, but at some point you have to pay the piper.  That's the reason I'm not a fan of contracts with voidable years tacked on to the end just to make the money work out in the present time.  The Saints mastered the technique to keep their Super Bowl window open and now they suck and their cap is a dumpster fire..  People say Sean Peyton left just because of Drew Brees retiring.  That's not the ONLY reason and now you see why.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure Fitterer and Wilks are gonna be collaborative...basically like a normal head coach-GM works rather than the Rhule "full power" bullsh-t.

Exactly. So Fitterer takes the bulk of this blame....like most GM's do. 

I give him a pass on every move prior to Rhule getting canned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

In reality, it really is… until there are penalties for continuing to push money down the road teams will continue doing it.

That’s one reason that I don’t worry about the cap anymore. It’s all bullshit…

There was an article a while back about how the "kick the can" approach was becoming a more prominent thing.

Basically, people saw the Saints getting away with it and said "hey, we can do that too".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

They spent it because they had to save face. Tepper made a mess and it had to get cleaned up. They had to look like they were at least doing something to get better, because restructuring all those deals made things a lot worse. The RA deal was crap. We all know it. But mortgaging your teams financial future to go after a guy who never had any interest in playing for this team unless there was no other option was stupid. Darnold is gone after this year so the 19m on this years disappears too. 

Agreed. Except throwing away 19M on a backup is the reason they had to restructure any of them this year. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

That’s the total with 38 players. Not 53. So add about 15M for 15 players and you get the real total. 

Thats true and all, but they were 10ish in the red before and now they are not. Hence below the cap. They were planning on cutting anderson, got a buyer and same affect. Yes draft class and need more players, but now they dont have anderson to worry with. top 51 count, Im sure you know that as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There was an article a while back about how the "kick the can" approach was becoming a more prominent thing.

Basically, people saw the Saints getting away with it and said "hey, we can do that too".

Right… and it’s ridiculous… like is Gayle going to have her team continue to kick the can until she passes and let the new owner deal with it…

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

In reality, it really is… until there are penalties for continuing to push money down the road teams will continue doing it.

That’s one reason that I don’t worry about the cap anymore. It’s all bullshit…

teams should be punished for doing what it takes to be good? Lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPF4LIFE
      Blame Bryce Young!

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      I said earlier today I have no problem with that as it was need, but i feel like if you have to spend that much money on 2 guards then you probably think your QB needs it that much. Sad reality is bryce was still horrible. 
    • CPF4LIFE
      Blame Bryce Young!

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      I thought about this a lot watching the game today. We got whooped by a team that was just way more talented than us overall and was largely because we traded a poo load of compensation with them to just to get bryce. It's a agonizing feeling and like you said it just seems like bryce hasn't took it seriously enough. He didn't give 2 shits about not playing in the pre season and obviously didn't rationalize just how bad he has been cuz he was surprised he got benched.  It's just infuriating and knowing it sets you back for years is hard enough. It's a lot easier watching other teams make these horrible decisions. 
    • tukafan21
      Travis Hunter hype thread

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Ugh, here we go again. People need to stop falling for the Heisman/College hype and thinking he'll have the same type of impact in the NFL, because he won't (and side note, he's probably not even the Heisman favorite anymore, the kid from Boise State is going to put up numbers that are too good to not give him the award). Let's get this out of the way first, he will NOT be a full time 2 way player in the NFL, it's just not possible.  He can either be a full time WR or a full time CB who then gets maybe 5-10 snaps on offense a game to see if he can break off a big play. Once you remove the two way factor from him, he's just a great CB prospect and a very good WR prospect, but he's not a generational prospect on either side of the ball on it's own. If he decides to be a full time CB, I'm not against drafting him because it's a need. But if he decides to be a WR, there is no circumstance where he can be taken over T-Mac.  He'll be more of a slot WR in the NFL due to his size, particularly his slim frame.  T-Mac on the other hand is a true elite outside WR prospect, and those just don't grow on trees, there's only a small handful of players in the NFL with his size, hands, and speed/agility combination. To me, that's the differentiator when comparing Hunter to T-Mac as a WR.  If he was a plodding big WR, like Kelvin Benjamin was, it obviously changes things, but he's not, he has more than enough speed and agility to his game that when combined with his 6'5" frame, it's a no brainer for me, he's going to be WR #1 on every team's board. For Hunter, there is nothing wrong with being a true generational collegiate talent and just a very good to great NFL prospect, and being able to separate the two when evaluating him for the NFL is very important. I'm not bashing him (looking at you Cam), but I'm just being realistic about what he will be in the NFL, which is a potential Top 10 CB, but not a Top 10 WR, but like one of the best #2 guys in the NFL or a mid to low end #1
×
×
  • Create New...