Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D played better with no phil snow


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Seemed the same

 

28 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Seemed the same

 

48 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not really. Injuries are a part of the game. We've played without Horn and Luvu before, as well as others. The defense would probably look a lot better if the offense wasn't dog poo.

Yeah, I didn't notice much difference especially considering how much the Ram's O has struggled this season.  The Rams, scored more points in the Atlanta game, but besides that, this was the Ram's  best offensive performance.  We had injuries last week too, Chinn, Luvu, Woods and STO were out last week with Horn getting hurt mid game.   Kupp was hurt and the OL decimated.  Its not a great look.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They played literally identical.  Same play calls for the most part.   This is just subconscious rose colored glasses for someone happy Snow is gone.  The defense has been solid all year.  They are just built badly for how we play.   Our defense is built on speed and aggressiveness playing with a lead.  When you are playing conservative grind it out ball or playing from behind with the defense on the field all second half this is about the best you can always expect.   It was a terrible gameplan.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm still not touching Hunter He again said the other day that he plans on playing both sides of the ball in the NFL.  If he is allowed to do that, he won't be as good on either side as his potential and he's going to have serious injury issues and have a short career.  If he's not allowed to do it, I think he's going to become a problem when the team isn't winning as he's going to feel him not being used on both sides of the ball is why. He's being coddled in that environment with Deion and I think it's doing a disservice to him to prepare him for life in the NFL where your coach isn't a 2nd father to you, to where you can just walk into his locker room and steal his shoes like Hunter does to Deion.
    • He’s a tad behind them. Around 15ish of 32 starters in the league. He’s well ahead of a lot of guys. Tua, Bryce, Cousins (present), Rodgers (current), Devito/Jones, Minshew, Russ (current), Watson, Smith, Carr, T Laws deep ball is weak as poo IMO, there’s plenty. And it’s not like everyone is ripping 60+ers. The key component is if you can rip and maintain velocity of the 30-40 yarders which he does super well. Legit every report out there from Brugler to PFF to PFN document him as good/above average arm strength.  Eye test tells me it’s pretty much that as well, slightly above average.
    • 6-10 carries for  35-45 yds and 3-5 catches for 15-25 would be great. 
×
×
  • Create New...