Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Way of the Panther (Jonathan Jones)


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I still can't believe there were a few people defending Rhule all the up to that 49ers game.  I'm not sure if they were just homers that don't like people in this organization bad-mouthed or if they really thought Rhule was a decent coach.  Either way, it was painfully obvious to the other 99% of the Huddle that Rhule was a joke.  Dude would crush it on a used car lot!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I still can't believe there were a few people defending Rhule all the up to that 49ers game.  I'm not sure if they were just homers that don't like people in this organization bad-mouthed or if they really thought Rhule was a decent coach.  Either way, it was painfully obvious to the other 99% of the Huddle that Rhule was a joke.  Dude would crush it on a used car lot!

I know there are some folks who like taking up unpopular positions just to be a--holes.

Find that kinda stupid myself but hey...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I still can't believe there were a few people defending Rhule all the up to that 49ers game.  I'm not sure if they were just homers that don't like people in this organization bad-mouthed or if they really thought Rhule was a decent coach.  Either way, it was painfully obvious to the other 99% of the Huddle that Rhule was a joke.  Dude would crush it on a used car lot!

Also the people that were on the "It doesn't matter at this point, we're going to lose either way" train. Borderline cruel to not want a less toxic environment for the players and staff for the rest of the year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I still can't believe there were a few people defending Rhule all the up to that 49ers game.  I'm not sure if they were just homers that don't like people in this organization bad-mouthed or if they really thought Rhule was a decent coach.  Either way, it was painfully obvious to the other 99% of the Huddle that Rhule was a joke.  Dude would crush it on a used car lot!

"shock the world"

 

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know there are some folks who like taking up unpopular positions just to be a--holes.

Find that kinda stupid myself but hey...

Looking at this roster, this coaching staff and the qb's on this team in the preseason and not seeing a complete trainwreck is on you.  Anyone with a brain could see this happening.   All the optimism in the world,  all the unicorns and rainbows, all the supposed fandom wasnt going to change reality.  This was (another) wasted year from the jump. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Was Pepsi still the official soft drink of the Panthers at the time?

I do think it's odd that we did had Pepsi (originated in Goldsboro NC) then switch to Coca-Cola (originated in Atlanta... home of the crows...er Falcons).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never liked the guy and now I like him even less. Holy shite there it is, a peak behind the curtain of stupid. 

If I was a kid and this guy got hired at my school I would transfer. 

Fx Networks Indian GIF by Reservation Dogs

I hope Tepper learned because if he comes near that BS again from any employee he should tell them to go fug themselves and not look back.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it from the beginning. Rhule reminds me of Butch Jones and the way he ran things at UT. Lots of corny cliches and unicorns/rainbows, but no results on the field to show for it. Players eventually resent that kind of poo. I know for a fact the majority of UT players hated Botch. They’d both crush it together on a car lot.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...