Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An analysis of what went wrong between Tepper and Rhule by Charles Robinson


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

NFL history is littered with franchises that found themselves hypnotized by the track forward: focused ahead, insistent on plowing over one mistake after another. All the while, never contemplating whether they might have been opening a hole beneath themselves.

That has been Carolina for the past few years. Now Tepper has to find his way out of it.

 

That last bit there, that's some masterful writing and insight.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good read, always bothered me that Rhule came into the league with a manifesto to get Teddy. Giving him 60 mil and then cutting him after one season while repeatedly throwing him under the bus fractured my confidence in Rhule too.

Edited by CatMan72
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/10/13/23401627/carolina-panthers-fire-matt-rhule-david-tepper-next-steps

The ringer ways in.

 

Since Rhule’s hiring, the Panthers haven’t been anything other than a bad football team—a bad football team with a bad quarterback and a bad coach. Rhule was given free reign to mold the roster to his liking and multiple shots at finding a long-term solution at quarterback. But the roster isn’t any better today than it was when Rhule took over in 2020, and the quarterback situation is arguably worse. As the face of the whole operation, Rhule was an obvious scapegoat.

 

Damn

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CatMan72 said:

Good read, always bothered me that Rhule came into the league with a manifesto to get Teddy. Giving him 60 mil and then cutting him after one season while repeatedly throwing him under the bus fractured my confidence in Rhule too.

Two things to me if they are true.

1. Tepper initially trusted his GM and coach

2. The Teddy and sam failure raised massive red flags to him

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Stafford would not have performed well here. He threw the most INTs in the league last year, and that was with a better supporting cast and McVay as the coach.

Stafford also knew Rhule and co were terrible so it wasn’t going to happen anyway.

My gut tells me Stafford would have been on season ending IR at some point during that season.

We dodged a bullet

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Stafford would not have performed well here. He threw the most INTs in the league last year, and that was with a better supporting cast and McVay as the coach.

Stafford also knew Rhule and co were terrible so it wasn’t going to happen anyway.

My gut tells me Stafford would have been on season ending IR at some point during that season.

It’s also been reported that Stafford did not want to play for the Panthers

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is amazing how a billionaire (Tepper) and a multi-millionaire (Rhule) can make so many stupid mistakes.  I think most of us were shocked at the huge contract for Teddy, the dumping of him, and then the big trade for Sam (giving up a early 2nd round pick), along with guaranteeing his 5th year option.  Yet unbelievably, the Panthers actually did these things.  I could see Tepper moving the Panthers away from the Carolinas 'due to not being able to get a new stadium or new practice facilities'.  Not a fan of his.    

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I think they are wanting to let XL and Coker develop, but I don't see nothing wrong with a speed guy on day 2
    • Finding that dance partner will be difficult and who's to say the team trading up has not offer a package to 5th, 6th, 7th??? They did and were turned down most likely.    I still feel 8th is the hot spot for OT run. If you want the best OT/OL in the draft, 8th is the way.    *But Ive been reading lots of Jets and others having Membou as their pick. Banks and Campbell are right there in great value terms. The whole deal is that pick for the Panthers, they are not looking to spend a top resource on OL, 31 other teams are.    I've also been seeing sanders falling out of the top ten, I just have a hard time buying that. ALso seen dart being drafted in the top ten. FYI last year NO ONE had a 1st round grade on Bo Nix and many thought Michael Penix Jr. was at best late 1st early 2nd. I laugh hard at the failcons drafting Penix at 8th, but I stopped laughing during that week 18 game.... he looked legit......barf....  So... one team could easily trade up for sanders or dart or begin the OL run or Jeanty causes a stir as he falls.  There are legit options, Brandt and Dan get paid for this...
    • I'm with you.  Even an extra 3rd would help.  None of the players you listed are elite though.  Sadly there are very few of those in this draft, but there are a lot of good players in the late first and into the second. We need to realize that we can't get all our needs in this year's draft.  We know we need some sort of edge, a safety, and I feel we need to use one of first 4 picks on a CB, preferably 3rd at latest.  And I want to draft an OT in 3rd to learn behind Moton this year. The extra 2nd would be huge.  2 things Bear Hands has noted in other threads, we can get a rusher in the mid rounds of the first, and if a good LT is available at our pick we should be able to get a deal. I'm ok.  If the media takes are close, trading back to around 15 should get us a second, and since our second is near the end of that round, getting one earlier opens up a whole lot of opportunities.  Either way, Canales builds his infrastructure with this draft.  Next year, with all our picks and probably picking somewhere between 10 and 15, we can get real stars.   All of this depends on hitting on picks this year.
×
×
  • Create New...