Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What might a Steve Wilks staff look like?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Shocker said:

LOL…Mr Scott…great post but this constant plugging of Rob Chudzinski makes me question your thought process.  

It’s no plug. I’m not a Chudzinski fan. I’m strictly looking at people that have a previous connection to Wilks and are potentially available.

That said, I’d likely take Chudzinski over McAdoo.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

It’s no plug. I’m not a Chudzinski fan. I’m strictly looking at people that have a previous connection to Wilks and are potentially available.

That said, I’d likely take Chudzinski over McAdoo.

McAdoo finishes the season IMO.  I look forward to seeing him without Rhules bullshet personally 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

McAdoo finishes the season IMO.  I look forward to seeing him without Rhules bullshet personally 

This thread was about next year, specifically who Wilks might hire if he could choose his own staff.

Barring some major turnaround, I seriously doubt McAdoo would be retained in that scenario.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

This thread was about next year, specifically who Wilks might hire if he could choose his own staff.

Barring some major turnaround, I seriously doubt McAdoo would be retained in that scenario.

Next year Sean Payton is going to be the coach…time to start thinking about that angle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

LOL…Mr Scott…great post but this constant plugging of Rob Chudzinski makes me question your thought process.  

Why is that such a bad idea?  I don't know if you remember our offense with Chudz.  Had we had a defense those teams would have been playoff teams. 

Cam's first two games were over 400 yds passing and Cam was dynamic back then.  Shula was supposed to take that offense and simplify it and it was a disaster.   Chudz wasn't much of a head coach in Cleveland but I'd take his offense in a heartbeat over McAdoo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Why is that such a bad idea?  I don't know if you remember our offense with Chudz.  Had we had a defense those teams would have been playoff teams. 

Cam's first two games were over 400 yds passing and Cam was dynamic back then.  Shula was supposed to take that offense and simplify it and it was a disaster.   Chudz wasn't much of a head coach in Cleveland but I'd take his offense in a heartbeat over McAdoo.

This guy is an assistant coach for Boston College.  Look up their record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...