Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Stewart to discuss the Matt Rhule era and interim Coach Steve Wilkes at 8pm tonight on the C3 Panthers Podcast


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

So...just curious.   Tepper said the HC gets to pick his staff.  But no way that Rhule hired a guy that was set to replace him.

??????

There were three coaches brought in with previous HC experience.  I think Rhule saw the writing on the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

So...just curious.   Tepper said the HC gets to pick his staff.  But no way that Rhule hired a guy that was set to replace him.

??????

I strongly suspect that Rhule was voluntold to bring in coaches with significant NFL experience in order to keep his job, or perhaps with the understanding that year 3 would be it if the results didn't improve notably. At no point prior did he ever adapt, so it seems unlikely he'd suddenly do it of his own accord.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I strongly suspect that Rhule was voluntold to bring in coaches with significant NFL experience in order to keep his job, or perhaps with the understanding that year 3 would be it if the results didn't improve notably. At no point prior did he ever adapt, so it seems unlikely he'd suddenly do it of his own accord.

Yup, Rhule had to get NFL guys in to try to prove that Brady/Blackburn were holding him back, Tepper wanted NFL guys in place for this interim HC situation. So McAdoo/Tabor make sense as coordinators. The thing that wasn't "necessary" but happened was Wilks in with the secondary. I gotta think Tepper said Wilks is your CB coach deal with it 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

J Stew should be a broadcaster for the team. I'm not a podcast listener but I may consider listening to his. Those other guys though.

Go listen to his BLeav podcast. Dude drops some serious knowledge. I've gone back and listened to most of his podcasts from the past year just because I like hearing him talk football. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup, Rhule had to get NFL guys in to try to prove that Brady/Blackburn were holding him back, Tepper wanted NFL guys in place for this interim HC situation. So McAdoo/Tabor make sense as coordinators. The thing that wasn't "necessary" but happened was Wilks in with the secondary. I gotta think Tepper said Wilks is your CB coach deal with it 

I wouldn't be so sure it was Tepper who chose Wilks.  He may have suggested or even issued a directive to someone else that a competent nfl coach be hired.  Someone with nfl head coaching experience but not specifically who that must be. 

Now having said that, I would not be surprised if he also didn’t give a second direct to a certain individual to look for a possible replacement for the person that is the reason for why he had to issue the first directive. 

But that just me.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I wouldn't be so sure it was Tepper who chose Wilks.  He may have suggested or even issued a directive to someone else that a competent nfl coach be hired.  Someone with nfl head coaching experience but not specifically who that must be. 

Now having said that, I would not be surprised if he also didn’t give a second direct to a certain individual to look for a possible replacement for the person that is the reason for why he had to issue the first directive. 

But that just me.

Yeah, the only reason I went a little conspiracy theory on that is that Stew kinda alluded to Wilks being brought in incase this exact scenario played out as it has. Stew maybe was just generalizing it but worded it like it was intentional. Tepper didn't seem to know we had 3 NFCS championships in a row or that Charlotte had Concerts before Garth Brooks so it probably wasn't his idea lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah, the only reason I went a little conspiracy theory on that is that Stew kinda alluded to Wilks being brought in incase this exact scenario played out as it has. Stew maybe was just generalizing it but worded it like it was intentional. Tepper didn't seem to know we had 3 NFCS championships in a row or that Charlotte had Concerts before Garth Brooks so it probably wasn't his idea lol

No but Fitterer did. Just saying. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No but Fitterer did. Just saying. 

I hope Fitt did, and wasn't responsible for the idea of the QB trades. His FA pickups were solid so I think he should get the benefit of the doubt, especially after hearing about Rhule even fuging with the social media team. Also I remember the Darnold thing stemmed from Snow saying he looked like Stafford on tape lol. Stafford has been playing like Darnold this year so maybe he was on to something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...