Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs Blue Jackets 7pm Puck Drop


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Projected lines… coming in hot.

Teravainen - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Stastny - Staal - Fast

Martinook - Stepan - Kase

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

de Haan - Chatfield

Andersen

Raanta


Extra’s - Noesen, Coghlan, Bear

LTIR - Pacioretty, Gardiner

That’s a Stanley cup lineup. Plain and simple. Top to bottom. Best roster in the NHL. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Projected lines… coming in hot.

Teravainen - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Stastny - Staal - Fast

Martinook - Stepan - Kase

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

de Haan - Chatfield

Andersen

Raanta


Extra’s - Noesen, Coghlan, Bear

LTIR - Pacioretty, Gardiner

Is Coghlan still injured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Is Coghlan still injured?

Yes, interesting to see Chatfield starting over Coghlan.

Don't get me wrong I think Chatfield is a fine 3rd pair defenseman, but I like what I've seen out of Coghlan especially as the PP2 QB.

Also, I guess Rod doesn't trust Drury or Noesen yet.  I would rather see them on that 4th line than Marty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it doesn’t appear that Coghlan is hurt, RBA said it was a tough decision and they decided to go with Chatfield. Think it could be partly because Chatfield is a better pure defender than Coghlan and Bear. RBA also said that there will be a lot of rotation at that position.

Columbus has a lot of firepower so RBA might want the best defensive defenseman out there.

Coghlan definitely has a place on this team though, he’s going to be a real good third pairing, puck moving defenseman and PP QB2.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So it doesn’t appear that Coghlan is hurt, RBA said it was a tough decision and they decided to go with Chatfield. Think it could be partly because Chatfield is a better pure defender than Coghlan and Bear. RBA also said that there will be a lot of rotation at that position.

Columbus has a lot of firepower so RBA might want the best defensive defenseman out there.

Coghlan definitely has a place on this team though, he’s going to be a real good third pairing, puck moving defenseman and PP QB2.

I suspect we will see Chatfield and Coghlan rotate based on matchups (game matchups) Columbus has a lot of firepower but they did nothing to improve there horrible defense and goalie situations.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I suspect we will see Chatfield and Coghlan rotate based on matchups (game matchups) Columbus has a lot of firepower but they did nothing to improve there horrible defense and goalie situations.

Which is why Chatfield is playing tonight in my opinion, we won’t need Coghlan’s offense, but we need our best defenders on the ice.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...