Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper is supposed to have a press conference at 345pm


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You forgot about COVID. He must've mentioned COVID 20 times. Yes, Dave. We know. The Panthers had to deal with COVID... along with everyone and every other organization on the planet.

 

...its all lip service to cover up his piss poor nfl business acumen.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Billy Joel… Camping World Stadium… if I want to look at pretty girls I’ll go to the beach… don’t need a Kenny Chesney concert for that.

I said the last concert at the stadium not any stadium. I went to the Billy Joel concert here and it was great, same with Elton John. And just because you and I don't like Kenny Chesney doesn't mean that like 50,000 other people don't. 

And as someone who has been to some of the best venues in the U.S. when it comes to entertainment… I’d much rather be at a smaller venue…

That's your preference. Tons of people love stadium shows, and now we have use of the actual stadium in downtown Charlotte for those people. 

Red Rocks Amphitheater and St. Augustine Amphitheater are much better than some big ass stadium.

Talking about Charlotte. Tepper didn't claim he brought music to Colorado or Florida. Jesus. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You forgot about COVID. He must've mentioned COVID 20 times. Yes, Dave. We know. The Panthers had to deal with COVID... along with everyone and every other organization on the planet.

 

Im just curious why you say he mentioned it 20x , when he only mentioned it twice:
 

1. When he talks about taking ownership of the Panthers during COVID

2. Starting up the MLS team during COVID. 

Whats the goal here on embelishing the truth? I am just attempting to understand your mindset here. I hope you don't take offense to this... Im just having trouble understanding why you chose this specific piece to emphasize...

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Im just curious why you say he mentioned it 20x , when he only mentioned it twice:
 

1. When he talks about taking ownership of the Panthers during COVID

2. Starting up the MLS team during COVID. 

Whats the goal here on embelishing the truth? Just attempting to understand your mindset here. I hope you don't take offense to this... Im just having trouble understanding why you chose this specific piece to emphasize...

I definitely heard COVID more than twice. Yeah, 20 was an exaggeration but it felt like he shoehorned COVID into every answer he could manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I liked his comment about taking a risk with rhule.  Says you will not win in life without taking risks

It was such a dumb risk though. Like really dumb. The hype around Rhule was mystifying at the time and he bought into it, literally and figuratively, hook, line, and sinker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I definitely heard COVID more than twice. Yeah, 20 was an exaggeration but it felt like he shoehorned COVID into every answer he could manage.

I listened to the whole thing again, he only says it twice. I read your message and wanted to see if he used COVID as an excuse for the delay in his firing of Rhule.  He talks about "4 years of ownership, 2 of those being COVID" and then then other comment was the concerts and MLS team planning being done during COVID. 

I am surprised he didnt lean into it a bit more, but I guess he knows its not an excuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...