Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks/Holcomb Hype


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

He was also terrible as our DC.  I think the guy is at his level as a position coach.  There is nothing wrong with that.  He seems like a good dude who connects well with the players . . . but just not more than that.

#2 Overall, top ten points allowed,rush D  and almost every other metric 1st in sacks? 

 

You got him mixed up with that idiot after him Eric Washington.... derp

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

He was also terrible as our DC.  I think the guy is at his level as a position coach.  There is nothing wrong with that.  He seems like a good dude who connects well with the players . . . but just not more than that.

I think you mixed up Eric Washington for Wilks 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

I agree with you on playing closer to the LOS as opposed to playing more in space, which was never his strength. Playing LB full time would not be a good long-term career move for him IMO. And unnecessary with the depth we currently have there.

Should really watch Chinn in his rookie year again. Luvu has developed greatly which is awesome and gives us a good problem to have. Chinn just can't be dropped back he's a waste back there. His 6'3" stronk ass needs to be poppin off at the LoS regardless of what he is listed at position wise. This is the era of hybrids like TE/WR and S/LB, C/S, RB/WR, etc. so it isn't a big deal as long as he's used correctly which I think Wilks is going to do.

 

(I also can't add any more pie today for some reason or i'd have put one on your post)

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Martin said:

Also, in Arizona he had to work with the combo of Rosen at QB and Keim at GM, brutal stuff. Not sure if he’s a good HC or not, but hard to fault him for the Arizona fiasco.

Yeah it was so fast we didn't even get a chance to actually tell. It would be so cool if it works out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh it's addition by subtraction. My only expectations is that the players should be put in a better position to succeed in game...at least on D.  

I don't think the wins change much this year or that Wilks is a long term answer. We still have a McAdoo problem and Wilks was never more than a good DB coach with 1 year as a DC and HC. Just added basic stability and not Rhule's erratic BS along with a chance to see guys who Rhule wouldn't play for whateverfugging reasons. 

Watching Rhule's guys have meltdowns if they can't get their behinds in gear will be another positive. Time to cull the herd of overpaid underachievers that were on that bus to nowhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...