Matt Corral

[Varking]

17 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

No burrow available...upgrade OL.

They don’t have to be Burrow to be an upgrade for us. 

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

No burrow available...upgrade OL.

Who are you wanted to draft to replace who on the OL?? We have a rookie LT who looks the part and Moton is a lock for RT with his contract and performance. So you are spending a first to upgrade one of the 2 solid OGs or a C? If we extend Bozeman a C isn’t needed.

[heel31ok]

17 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Who are you wanted to draft to replace who on the OL?? We have a rookie LT who looks the part and Moton is a lock for RT with his contract and performance. So you are spending a first to upgrade one of the 2 solid OGs or a C? If we extend Bozeman a C isn’t needed.

Yes upgrade inside and you have better line with solid depth.yes im spending a first on that for sure. Skoronski. Best lineman in the draft. Instead of a hit or miss qb I prefer  building the line.

[heel31ok]

1 hour ago, Varking said:

They don’t have to be Burrow to be an upgrade for us. 

For your argument to work they do.

Edited January 1, 2023 by heel31ok

[Varking]

Just now, heel31ok said:

For your argument to work they do.

Not at all. There’s a large gap between Darnold and Burrow. 

[heel31ok]

12 minutes ago, Varking said:

Not at all. There’s a large gap between Darnold and Burrow. 

Yes.my pt exactly.upgrading over Arnold wasnt your argument, Burrow was , and again no Burrow available. You set Burrow as the standard.Back to pt , better to elevatethe line.

[Varking]

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

Yes.my pt exactly.upgrading over Arnold wasnt your argument, Burrow was , and again no Burrow available. You set Burrow as the standard.Back to pt , better to elevatethe line.

Please retype this. 

[chbright]

Lol no MVP QB at our draft spot so get a interior lineman. That's rich.

[heel31ok]

53 minutes ago, Varking said:

Please retype this. 

Smokescreen....

[heel31ok]

51 minutes ago, chbright said:

Lol no MVP QB at our draft spot so get a interior lineman. That's rich.

Yes , very profitable.

[Varking]

8 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Smokescreen....

That’s what you call it when you jumble all your words together? 

[LinvilleGorge]

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Yes upgrade inside and you have better line with solid depth.yes im spending a first on that for sure. Skoronski. Best lineman in the draft. Instead of a hit or miss qb I prefer  building the line.

Any GM that considers drafting IOL in the top 10 should get fired.

With the possible exception of a good team holding that pick due to a prior trade with an obvious need at IOL. But a team that's there because they suck cannot afford to spend a premium pick like that on IOL. That's worse than picking a RB 

[heel31ok]

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Any GM that considers drafting IOL in the top 10 should get fired.

With the possible exception of a good team holding that pick due to a prior trade with an obvious need at IOL. But a team that's there because they suck cannot afford to spend a premium pick like that on IOL. That's worse than picking a RB 

Drafting best lineman is always a good consideration, especially when the qb situation doesnt offer you that franchise player you need.Building a great line improves the whole offense. Thats not fireable or debatable.

[heel31ok]

39 minutes ago, Varking said:

That’s what you call it when you jumble all your words together? 

My jumbled words werent hard to understand , nor was you misdirection away from the subject at hand.