Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predict: Which Week Sam Darnold will be inserted Starter by?


SammyFranchise
 Share

Predict Which Week Sam Darnold will get his first Start  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. When will Sam make his first start?

    • Week 5
    • Week 6
    • Week 7
    • Week 8
    • Week9+ or Later
    • Never! Baker will start the entire season regardless how trash he is.

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/16/2022 at 06:18 AM

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the injury was real but I do also think Rhule would have found some way to keep PJ.

Suspicious Season 3 GIF by Parks and Recreation

I don't trust Rhule and Co. at all. He lacks integrity and has lied to the fan base on multiple occasions.

He tells us one thing but does exactly what we already knew he wanted to do. I don't trust the weasel one bit.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll happen, unfortunately, unless the offense figures something out. Baker will start forcing things to try to make something happen and the INTs will come.  Once Rhule can blame a couple losses on Baker he'll make the swap, but it'll only be worse and we will bounce between our 3 QBs like it's 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, X-Clown said:

Sam was outplayed by a guy that was signed off the street last year that had a bum shoulder. He has 64 career touchdowns and 73 career turnovers. 

Baker may not end up being the guy but he's never been Sam level bad

When did the outplaying happen because I never saw that. Matt Rhule said Baker "won" the job "won" the C on his chest I never saw a "competition".

His "competition" was just two players and nobody else and Sam was vanquished by what? Bakers talent? Rhule was hooking poor Baker up. This wasn't about skill or competition it was about his collection of wayward QBs on Teppers dime and our time.

Baker won't last a year, it's on to the next next year, probably a failed QB from elsewhere.

Baker sucks worst than Sam Im also sure Baker has more fans too and that's OK but Baker ain't playing better football than anybody even Sam.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cam Jordan was on Good Morning Football.  A player like Cam (lifelong Saint and a great ambassador for any team--I like him a lot) could be used by the Saints to create a smokescreen.  He denied that the Saints would take a QB in the first round, claiming that it has not been done since Manning in 1971 (paraphrasing)... It seems to me, (conspiracy theory forthcoming) that bit of information would have to have been researched/premeditated/planned.  Was he attempting to scoff at the concept that the Saints would draft a QB at #10?  Remember, Carr missed 7 games last year and had a 63.something QB rating.  He was not believed to be returning in 2025.  When the Saints thought that one of the top 2 Qbs were not going to be there at #10, they did not take advantage of the void clause in his contract, the way I understand it.  That means they continued to kick the Carr contract down the road.  In 2026, Carr's cap number is $69m--nearly a quarter of the cap for a 35-year old QB they do not want.  He is to be paid a $40m salary with a $10m roster bonus. While I am not a capologist, it is interesting if they really like Shedeur. All that matters is the perception that the Saints will take him at 10. If the Giants pass on him, and I think they likely will, Sanders could draw interest from the Raiders (I do not see it) at 6 or the Jets at 7 (more likely, but still unlikely).  The Panthers are the most likely trade partner--unless the Jets want to move back.  So who may realistically trade up for a qb?  The Colts (14), but there is no noise about them taking a QB and I do not think they have shown interest--instead, a competition between Richardson and Jones is the plan.  The Steelers (21) are in play, and the Rams are in play.  There is, however, another option for Carolina as a trade partner--The Saints.  A draft day switch for a third rounder might keep the Panthers targeting their player at 8 and add a pick in the process, suggesting they do not want to move back--but I get the impression that the Panthers are looking to move back.  
    • I said this a week ago and someone said it's idiotic basically  bc they want Rodgers. Newsflash,  Rodgers is a 1 year bandaid at most and if he gets hurt, Pittsburgh  has nothing else  but just traded for Metcalf.  I still think Shedaur may go to the Giants tho. Feels its a battle in the front office on him. We will see but I'd gladly take that trade package lol
×
×
  • Create New...