Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If there's one thing about our old friend Ken Dorsey, it's that he is always cool as a cucumber.


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

You realise Dorsey is a first time OC in his first year, right?

Didn't we just make the mistake of hiring an inexperienced HC?

Dorsey has been coaching in the pros for years (under respected staffs) and played for years before that.

That's a big, BIG difference from Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

They had come back, were within a FG of winning, Allen was forced up in the pocket and threw a pass over the middle, WR couldn't get to the sideline but was within a yard of ideal FG range, was tackled and got up with 8 seconds left, time expired before they could clock it.

It’s the receivers fault, he should’ve went down right away which would have given them more time to clock it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RJK said:

2/3 of the team was on the bench with cramps, in the locker room getting IVs or just out with injuries. Both corners and safeties missed this game. The only reason the dolphins could compete and Buffalo still should’ve  won that game. I’m all for Dorsey as next HC

Just remember, Mike Shula was once a hot HC candidate name too. It's easy to look like you know what you're doing when you have an MVP caliber QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just remember, Mike Shula was once a hot HC candidate name too. It's easy to look like you know what you're doing when you have an MVP caliber QB.

True but since tepper stuck with rhule they missed out on daboll. Panthers need to get that pipeline headed the other direction. Plus Dorsey is the perfect HC for a team that most likely will be taking a QB in the top 10. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RJK said:

True but since tepper stuck with rhule they missed out on daboll. Panthers need to get that pipeline headed the other direction. Plus Dorsey is the perfect HC for a team that most likely will be taking a QB in the top 10. 

If the chargers keep floundering they may decide he's the perfect HC to help them maximize Justin Herbert and if  Dorsey I'm thinking that a bird in hand is much better than hoping to catch the right bird in the draft bush.

If the Chargers job is open I have to think they're the most coveted job out there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If the chargers keep floundering they may decide he's the perfect HC to help them maximize Justin Herbert and if  Dorsey I'm thinking that a bird in hand is much better than hoping to catch the right bird in the draft bush.

If the Chargers job is open I have to think they're the most coveted job out there.

And yeah, Staley is on the fast track out of there.  No disrespect to JAX but after LAC assembled the team they did, you can't lose to them by 28 points.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And yeah, Staley is on the fast track out of there.  No disrespect to JAX but after LAC assembled the team they did, you can't lose to them by 28 points.

Yeah, we suck but honestly most all of us fully expected us to suck. 😂

It REALLY sucks to be the Chargers, Raiders, etc. and have the suck sneak up on you. That's rough.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...