Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

Well, I might be in the minority here but he’s not doing too much to help his case. He is barely ever getting separation. When he is getting touches they are less than thrilling. He just doesn’t have the #1 receiver mentality. 

I’ve always felt this way.  His routes are lazy sometimes And he  just isn’t in the same class as Jefferson and diggs 

I mean when was the last time it was DJ for the win

i don’t mean to dog the guy.  He just isn’t the guy for the game winner, ever, that I can recall 

and look I’m a Maryland Terp alumni and I wish he was what smith. Thought he would be but …. No

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

Blame the Bum Quarterback Moron

DJ Moore has spent his entire career playing with bum QBs.    

so what changed? We have an OC the league ran out for being horrific and predictable.   Rhule brought him back into the league. 
 


 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cam's New Arm Proficient

Cam's New Arm

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, CRA said:

First time in his career he has had a 3 game stretch where he failed to break 50 receiving yards. 

1 catch, 2 yards on the day. 

Davidson, Shula, Brady.  We have had a lot of bad OCs.   Ben McAdoo might the worst of them all.  Complete garbage.  

Hard when the QB sails every ball in the first half.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

There are enough guys on this roster that could make McAdoo look competent if he’d just get them the ball. Like Laviska today. This sh!t isn’t hard yet McAdoo is hellbent on proving that his garbage concepts that were figured out years ago are good

And that's what I said in the game thread...  why couldn't Laviska had been playing the first two weeks.  He made 90 yards off a flat route and a drag.  That doesn't require an extensive amount of knowledge or familiarity in any offense to run.  These coaches are just idiots and make things way harder than they have to be.

Look what NO was doing...  usually had a gut in the middle as a checkdown, but created space with their spacing/alignment and simple route concepts...  when they racked up all that yardage, upon first glance, it appeared all they did was run a flat/out and corner concept all the easy down the field.  A simple hi/lo...  all Jameis had to do was read where the defense shaded.

Meanwhile, they're being completely disrespectful sending nonstop blitzes and running man coverage like they have 4 prime Deions out there...  these are simple things to beat.  Slants, drags, rubs, bunch, snug, tight, doubles, stacks, etc.,  but nope.  Let's keep the same personnel and run another bootleg or screen they read like a Dr. Seuss book before it was ever ran.  Smh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)

All 22 over the past few weeks has shown it’s a mixed bag. DJ has shown to run lazy routes. I’m actually concern by what I’ve seen. Not protecting baker, bc that’s the other half of the problem. 
 

from my observations, DJ isn’t your typical receiver, he is more of a flex type. A player you scheme to get open similar to how rams use kupp and 49ers use Deebo. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...