Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints at Panthers GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. Baker missed two throws on that one drive and they were crucial misses on relatively easy throws but this overall offensive design is trash for our personnel. I have no idea why you hire an OC who thinks RBs can't be used in the passing game when your best player is the best pass catching RB in the NFL. And hiring an OC who heavily relied on TEs when that's probably the weakest position group on the entire roster.

It's just a square peg/round hole. The same thing is true on the other side of the ball. We have built a good young core of CBs but they're press man CBs. Why do you hire Steve Wilks as your secondary coach when he's a cover 3 guy? We have our press man CBs playing soft zone 10 yards off the LOS. Again, square peg/round hole.

Rhule went hiring names to impress Tepper with former NFL HCs on his staff. He didn't even bother to try to hire guys who could maximize his roster.

 

 

Honestly, I think they're bad fits that ended up here because although philosophically they don't line up with the personnel, where it does align is that they were mostly cast-offs who couldn't get these positions elsewhere had it not been with a guy who is on the hottest seat in the NFL that no other professional coach worth their salt would want to be associated with.  I think Campen and Tabor are the only exceptions there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

lol if we could have stopped beating ourselves we would be 2-0 see how that works? It's hillarious you think a team this bad should be "expected to put up more points'

This team sucks in the 2nd half if you haven't bee keeping up.  The sun shines on a dog's arse every now and then, so yeah, if they expect to pull this thing off, they should have built a bigger cushion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Honestly, I think they're bad fits that ended up here because although philosophically they don't line up with the personnel, where it does align is that they were mostly cast-offs who couldn't get these positions elsewhere had it not been with a guy who is on the hottest seat in the NFL that no other professional coach worth their salt would want to be associated with.  I think Campen and Tabor are the only exceptions there.

Bingo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...