Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Belichick surrendered?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

Unlikely as it may be, it is mathematically possible that they fall one game short of making the playoffs.

Risks like that are why you don't just 'surrender' when it's still possible to win.

They only needed what, three onside kicks to go their way?

You have a valid point, but you don't want to injure your players and lose even more games to put you even further out of playoff contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Henne Given Sunday Newbie

Henne Given Sunday

Posted
Posted

Unlikely as it may be, it is mathematically possible that they fall one game short of making the playoffs.

Risks like that are why you don't just 'surrender' when it's still possible to win.

sorry bro....you said yourself you didnt watch the game.....the patriots D had no answer for the saints......i dont even think i remember seeing the saints punter more than twice all game. and honestly....the saints were gunna score again late, but missed a easy field goal (karney looked retarded out there last night)

the patriots had no chance at all. and they have a big game against miami next week on the road (they are 0-4 on the road) if we beat them next week then we are a game back....they slip up again (rooting on you panthers) the phins can win the division......so they have plenty of season ahead of them to make the decisions they did last night (to sit the starters at the end)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So being up 59-0 against the Titans you leave your starters in and try and score more. But, being beat down by the Saints on Monday night you pull your starters to save injury? Hmmm...ok.

Pretty much. Heck, that was a weekly thing in 2007.

Technically, any play you leave the starters in for is an injury risk.

And yeah, Peyton came back from 21 points down with even less time a few years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

He is a poo hole of a human.

His defensive genius status should really be questioned right about now. That D looked horrible, and add to that their second half implosions all season, and that spells one and done in the post season.

IMO, the Vikings, SD, Indy, and NO could all take them to the house....possibly AZ as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdl Newbie

jdl

Posted
Posted

He is a poo hole of a human.

His defensive genius status should really be questioned right about now. That D looked horrible, and add to that their second half implosions all season, and that spells one and done in the post season.

IMO, the Vikings, SD, Indy, and NO could all take them to the house....possibly AZ as well.

you must have seen a different game then i saw. The pats D did very well, but brees had some awesome throws. The hardest position in the league is a DB back, even with great coverage you can get beat.

hopefully the saints are peaking too early and will bust at the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Purity-Control Newbie

Purity-Control

Posted
Posted

More dog sh*t from drama king Florio.

Apples & Oranges, that TENN game was back in October and after that the Pats had easy TB then a bye.

It's late in the season, mathematically or not anyone who watched that game knew they were not coming back. 21 pts in 5 mins saints were in bradys face all night, C'mon :rolleyes:

Hit the showers early get on the bus get rdy for miami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...