Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie Anderson: Fans shouldn't bring negative energy


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I really like Robbie, but I aint with him on this...  if you've ever played sports, it's part of the game, period.  You accept that.  Don't want to get booed?  Don't play like poo.  It's pretty simple.  Now, in this instance I have a little more empathy for the players because it's about 95% the coaching ad to the reason they're playing like poo.  Tough spot to be in...  hopefully Wilks takes control in a week or two and we turn it around, but Rhule will prolly be here until at least week 12.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

This isn't true. Adults let themselves be juvenile about almost anything. Some examples: politics, religion, drinking, cars, video games, movies, comics.

Go read Sandman and tell me it's juvenile, or the X-men graphic novel God Loves, Man Kills. But overall, yeah, point taken.

Seriously Sandman is amazing, and not remotely juvenile. Even the tv show on Netflix is good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Go read Sandman and tell me it's juvenile, or the X-men graphic novel God Loves, Man Kills. But overall, yeah, point taken.

Seriously Sandman is amazing, and not remotely juvenile. Even the tv show on Netflix is good.

Bro, those "men" who have walls of funkos are something else....... plus recording your reaction to open some 1K toy/lego set.....something else. They put a test to my theory.....but at least they are not simps....(I bet green cash a good % are)..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I defended him all last season but if you think you can poo on the fans after how shitty you have played on this new contract.....he can get fuged.

I will never support fans being abusive towards players or coaches but fans can boo as heartily as they want if the team or players are stinking it up.

Let me tell you, after this losing streak, we have every right to boo until the teams ears ring. 

Think about all the criticism Cam Newton endured across the sports spectrum from fans and the media. Did he ever cry about it and call people out including his own fans even though he had every justifiable right? No he let his play on the field speak. And he had actually won something of note. The more I think about this the more I think we need to purge the building of all things Jets minus Frankie Luvu. This in the midst of losing and fumbling the ball is just the very definition of soft. We can't beat the Browns. We can't beat the Giants. We would probably get stomped by the Jags like they just did the Colts. This is not a good team and nobody has the clout to be talking down to the folks who keep the lights on. Without fans and viewership this league is the XFL. Get this nonsense outta here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Think about all the criticism Cam Newton endured across the sports spectrum from fans and the media. Did he ever cry about it and call people out including his own fans even though he had every justifiable right? No he let his play on the field speak. And he had actually won something of note. The more I think about this the more I think we need to purge the building of all things Jets minus Frankie Luvu. This in the midst of losing and fumbling the ball is just the very definition of soft. We can't beat the Browns. We can't beat the Giants. We would probably get stomped by the Jags like they just did the Colts. This is not a good team and nobody has the clout to be talking down to the folks who keep the lights on. Without fans and viewership this league is the XFL. Get this nonsense outta here.

Robbie is a classic loser. 

Sadly, Rhule encourages this sort of behavior. Just look at his lack of accountability for himself. 

I am afraid we might have to purge a lot of that young core that he might have ruined.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Bro, those "men" who have walls of funkos are something else....... plus recording your reaction to open some 1K toy/lego set.....something else. They put a test to my theory.....but at least they are not simps....(I bet green cash a good % are)..

Vine Ok GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...