Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn….


rmoneyg35
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think he’s playing very well overall for what is only his fifth game as a pro. He’s had a couple of “burned” but each one also looks like he didn’t know his assignment or he was expecting help over top. I’m not trying to make excuses; I’m just perplexed how we are using so many safeties and never seem to have anyone deep. 
 

i don’t think this scheme is doing him any favors. Hell, chinn has been caught out of positions multiple times, or has been covering. on the touchdown to the tight end I don’t think that was Chinns man. Like I don’t have time to rewatch things but that whole play looked weird defensively. 
 

i think this scheme might look a lot better on paper. Or, in year three all the nfl offensive coordinators have figured it out. The giants and browns both looked like they had plays they knew they could go to when they needed to, and that’s how you game plan. Well, competent teams anyway. 
 

i think the panthers are staring down some bad blowouts soon. 

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I'd be pretty happy with him if he was a mid-round pick instead of a top 10 overall pick.

No one is calling him a bust but you're lying to yourself if you think he's truly playing well.

In fairness, the same can be said about Fields and that’s who people that hated the Horn pick wanted us to take. I understand positional value but both have been pretty meh thus far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Skack25 said:

Hard to truly evaluate anyone in this scheme.

Hindsight is 20/20.  If we'd have taken Fields or Parsons.. they'd both be nobodies.

That’s what’s so dam scary I truly believe they just can’t develop guys as well as they need to. One main reason is he has never done it before he doesn’t know what it takes to develop NFl players because his best work was at Baylor(college level). Look at coaches off Mcvay and Shanahans tree they understand it because they’ve seen it in the last few years. They’ve seen what it takes to develop and maximize a Deebo S or Cooper K. Rhule simply hasn’t done it yet I believe he’ll be a good coach his next time around now that he’s gotten his NFL experience. Time for him to reset and work his way back up to another NFl head coaching job in about 3 years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, rayzor said:

We drafted him because of his skills in man coverage, right? And we've got him playing zone.

Why should I expect anything else?

Rhule said during his presser yesterday that they are playing more zone now because Steve Wilks wants us to intercept the ball more. A novel thought, Coach Wilks.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skack25 said:

Hard to truly evaluate anyone in this scheme.

Hindsight is 20/20.  If we'd have taken Fields or Parsons.. they'd both be nobodies.

Parsons or “doesn’t have the size to play tackle” Slater should’ve been the pick. Justin Fields can’t play. Watch the damn tape people. He can’t read the field. It’s embarrassing to see how hyped up this guy got by “draft Twitter”. They only see what they want their excel spreadsheets to tell them. Also, how’s the 2021 class looking? “We have a real GM! He trades down!” YOU STILL HAVE TO GET PLAYERS THAT ARE GOOD!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...