Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tally of Everyone Who Believed in Rhule


PantherNation123
 Share

Recommended Posts

I can honestly say out of the list of the final 6 coaching candidates for the job to replace Rivera, Matt Rhule was guy #6!  So no, I've NEVER been in this dudes corner.  I'll go as far as to tell on myself and say Mike McCarthy was my top choice.  Yes, I know that would have probably been a train wreck too, but at least I'll admit that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherNation123 said:

Dude, please take a breath. I will always root for the panthers, even now that them winning could mean more Rhule….. And even if I were a Dunkin barista, (which fortunately or unfortunately I’m not), that “diss” speaks volumes about your character. Grow up, son. 

Fu!!  I hope you pull a muscle from all the self high fives you're giving yourself..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us were calling out his abysmal record against ranked teams even way back then, but what did it for me was him bringing his college buddy with him as DC. After further researching his resume, realized his only NFL coaching experience was as a linebackers coach for the 0-16 Detroit Lions. Then going out and getting yet another college coach (Brady) who wasn't even the damn OC for LSU with all those superstar WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is fuging toxic and this fanbase is worse.. Ppl rather cash in 3 year old recipes instead of actually wanting the team to win...smh ..

I'll take my warning for douchbaggery with pride..

I didn't start a "A Hahahahaha I knew "Stephen Hill" would suck thread.. Because it still hurt my fandom to be right..

I didn't want to celebrate that.. But I guess I'm different..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

because people on this forum don't understand college football

to put it into perspective, what rhule did at temple or baylor would get him a statue built in Chapel Hill.

That isn't saying much. Richardson had a statue here and we still don't have back to back winning seasons.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

because people on this forum don't understand college football

to put it into perspective, what rhule did at temple or baylor would get him a statue built in Chapel Hill.

Haha I mean that is a pretty gross overstatement.  His college “success” was never long term, he just made shitty teams less shitty after a couple years.  Again, he never won a top 25 game.  That is what matters in college football, even in chapel hill. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...