Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oh wow. Teddy with a legit deep ball. Yeah, it was underthrown but Hill being one of the best deep ball receivers in the league finds a way to reel it in anyway.

I have no idea why the announcers are drooling over the throw and the arm strength. 😂

That was Tyreke Hill being Tyreke Hill. Teddy underthrowing him just made his job harder.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh wow. Teddy with a legit deep ball. Yeah, it was underthrown but Hill being one of the best deep ball receivers in the league finds a way to reel it in anyway.

I have no idea why the announcers are drooling over the throw and the arm strength. 😂

That was Tyreke Hill being Tyreke Hill. Teddy underthrowing him just made his job harder.

Yeah if you have Mahomes or Allen making that throw and it’s an easy touchdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy is not bad.  I infamously said he "sucked" here, but again, that was relative, not a permanent state.  And I always liked him before he came here (excluding the Saints years obviously), going back to college.  He's a good guy snd a solid QB.  But I think a lot of our frustration with him was rooted in the team dumping Cam for him, the realization that the offense Rhule was trying to implement was not sexy, fun, or entertaining to watch and eventually would devolve into the current teainwreck we see now, and the fact that he was just so antithetical to what we had with Cam.  It was a bad spot to be in.

And obviously, had we known it was just going to get worse, I think most would've elected to just ride it out with Teddy until Rhule was fired anyway.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, exactlyzack said:

Yeah if you have Mahomes or Allen making that throw and it’s an easy touchdown.

Let's be real here. That was Teddy Bridgewater who I never saw him throw a ball that far in his life. I thought he must have heard the concerns about his arm strength and actually got stronger and added some muscle. I always thought he was too spindly not to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Teddy is not bad.  I infamously said he "sucked" here, but again, that was relative, not a permanent state.  And I always liked him before he came here (excluding the Saints years obviously), going back to college.  He's a good guy snd a solid QB.  But I think a lot of our frustration with him was rooted in the team dumping Cam for him, the realization that the offense Rhule was trying to implement was not sexy, fun, or entertaining to watch and eventually would devolve into the current teainwreck we see now, and the fact that he was just so antithetical to what we had with Cam.  It was a bad spot to be in.

And obviously, had we known it was just going to get worse, I think most would've elected to just ride it out with Teddy until Rhule was fired anyway.

Don't get me wrong, Teddy is by no means an ideal franchise QB or a guy who will win you a SB in my opinion. But he's an adequate starter ala Alex Smith with the Chiefs. As we saw from his success in NO under Payton when Brees was hurt. I wonder if Teddy could be a stopgap option to come back here IF we were to get Payton (we're almost certainly not going to, but it's been reported Tepper may be interested). Would make a lot of sense on paper if we got SP. Sign Teddy as bridge/veteran competition for a rookie QB that SP handpicks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Teddy is not bad.  I infamously said he "sucked" here, but again, that was relative, not a permanent state.  And I always liked him before he came here (excluding the Saints years obviously), going back to college.  He's a good guy snd a solid QB.  But I think a lot of our frustration with him was rooted in the team dumping Cam for him, the realization that the offense Rhule was trying to implement was not sexy, fun, or entertaining to watch and eventually would devolve into the current teainwreck we see now, and the fact that he was just so antithetical to what we had with Cam.  It was a bad spot to be in.

And obviously, had we known it was just going to get worse, I think most would've elected to just ride it out with Teddy until Rhule was fired anyway.

I have two entirely differing opinions on Teddy. One, Teddy sucks. Two, Teddy is a decent game manager.

One is the result of dumping our former MVP QB to name Teddy our newly anointed starter. But seriously, Teddy is an extremely underwhelming starter.

Two is Teddy as a backup QB. He's pretty much exactly what you want in a veteran backup. He's going to go out there, make the safe plays and not do anything to cost you the game. He's going to allow your team to win the games it should but he won't win you any that you shouldn't.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I have two entirely differing opinions on Teddy. One, Teddy sucks. Two, Teddy is a decent game manager.

One is the result of dumping our former MVP QB to name Teddy our newly anointed starter. But seriously, Teddy is an extremely underwhelming starter.

Two is Teddy as a backup QB. He's pretty much exactly what you want in a veteran backup. He's going to go out there, make the safe plays and not do anything to cost you the game. He's going to allow your team to win the games it should but he won't win you any that you shouldn't.

 

Yeah, that's pretty much where I'm at with him.  But it's pretty sobering when acknowledging that's how we feel about him now, and yet, over the last three years they've brought in a QB that performs even worse than he did in year one under Rhule (not counting Cam).  Man, it's been quite the slow, painful fall...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...