Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Damn Titans about to go 0-2. Seems like too soon to blow it up but Henry is wearing down and Tannehill isn't gonna win MVP anytime soon

Yep, they wore the tread off of Henry's tires and Tannehill is what he is - a decent QB if he has a dominant RB to hand to behind a dominant OL. Meanwhile, that once dominant OL looks like trash.

Just seems like their window has closed. Everything has to align perfectly if you don't have that dude at QB.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, they wore the tread off of Henry's tires and Tannehill is what he is - a decent QB if he has a dominant RB to hand to behind a dominant OL. Meanwhile, that once dominant OL looks like trash.

Just seems like their window has closed. Everything has to align perfectly if you don't have that dude at QB.

Maybe we'll get some Malik Willis games later on if they're out of the playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure I'm understanding why you'd arbitrarily cut off ACC titles before 2005 even though they are identical in weight. It's not like a meaningless game makes them any less valuable, especially since that game is usually just a blowout anyways. But even working off of this metric, you disingenuously make UNC-CH sound like it's some powerhouse that goes to the ACC title game on a regular basis. UNC-CH has 2 total appearances since 2005, a whopping one more than Duke and tied with Wake (whom actually won one of theirs). The inclusion of State there is sure doing some heavy lifting. I mean, hanging your hat on two players is a bit strange, no? Everyone knows those teams were largely carried by those QBs. And two of those wins over Duke were giftwrapped by the refs, especially that joke in 2023. Two more were the result of the fallout from Cutt staying on for longer than he should've. The only reason UNC-CH football is in a state as good as it's in is because y'all live off your brand. Fans expecting a program that hasn't won an ACC title in 44 years to be focused on winning them every year is a huge reach no matter how you slice it. If UNC-CH fans sincerely think this way, then I can only conclude that Tarheel football fans are rather delusional. 
    • You clearly don't understand the level of disgust. We have had it with him. 
    • With all due respect, no one gives a poo about who won the ACC in 1963. Bottom line is over the past 10 years UNC has been a much better football program than Duke and had championship aspirations when they were getting elite play from the QB position.
×
×
  • Create New...