Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper is the issue not Rhule


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, t96 said:

The point is Rhule’s inevitable firing won’t change anything. Unfortunately. 

Depends, does Tepper finally take a step back and let the people he hired do their jobs (i.e. letting Fitterer pick his coach) or does he continue to meddle. If he continues to meddle, then yes, the team will still have problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Depends, does Tepper finally take a step back and let the people he hired do their jobs (i.e. letting Fitterer pick his coach) or does he continue to meddle. If he continues to meddle, then yes, the team will still have problems.

All indications are he will meddle even more. I hope that doesn’t happen but that’s how it’s looking to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Unfortunately you can't fire the owner. So saying Tepper needs to be gone means absolutely jack crap. Rhule is the next target and should be gone before next game. Time to tank for a QB.

This. Its perfectly reasonable to hate a owner but we need to stop acting like they can just be fired because the team is bad. Owners arent apart of the coaching staff and thats whole other ballpark far as pushing them out.  Tepper just needs to get rid of Rhule and get a coach and staff in here who knows the damn NFL and how to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper definitely got us into this mess. And it's squarely on him to fix it. To most, we know what needs to be done as step #1, clean the staff out and sooner the better 

Only saving grace he did have bags of cash to go get us a coach and would have on a QB possibly too.

His grace has run out with rhule though. Imo the 1sr step in his arc is what he does with the mess. Cleaning it requires bags of money. Will he do it. #2 how does he pull out of this craziness. Another flashy signing that's another used car salesmen, a bad retread, or an actual good coach. 

So far #2 looks shaky based on the lackluster hirings so far have all been bad. Only fitterer and wilks bring back are the only nonshitty moves. It may take him 5 years to figure this out or find the right advisors. Right now, he's taking lumps learning on the fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...