Is this Not Concerning?

[WOW!!]

Everything at this point is a red flag...smh

 

[Jon Snow]

2 hours ago, Castavar said:

Saw this tweet and thought it was interesting

Shouldn't this raise a red flag? Won't this make us easier to predict when teams start getting tape on us?

You don't need tape to beat us. They are still running basic stuff. Or heaven forbid I hope they are. For whatever reason Rhule or McAdoo or both thought it was...hell I don't know what they were thinking. 

[therealmjl]

1 hour ago, CRA said:

McAdoo’s calling card once he was in charge was being painfully predictable on O.   

who is above McAdoo to solve the McAdoo issues here?  

Matt Rhu

 

ah you know what, nevermind 

[lightsout]

Well we don't really have a FB. We have talent at TE/needed the chip on Garrett. We have the depth at wr to keep fresh legs running 3 wide consistently. We have DJ and CMC who can line up anywhere.

We varied the formations a bunch. People get too hung up on personnel. It's not that big a deal. Only a problem when you fail to execute plays.

[poundaway]

Its true that McAdoo loved using the same packages in NY.

 A lot of our stumbles early didn't seem to be package related.  The fumbled snaps and holding penalties killed drives.   

On O it looks like we weren't prepared enough.  Rhule's excuse was we only had our QB for month.   Which is true.   But if that's the reason, how many weeks is enough time fix it?


 

 

[poundaway]

Just now, lightsout said:

Well we don't really have a FB. We have talent at TE/needed the chip on Garrett. We have the depth at wr to keep fresh legs running 3 wide consistently. We have DJ and CMC who can line up anywhere.

We varied the formations a bunch. People get too hung up on personnel. It's not that big a deal. Only a problem when you fail to execute plays.

True.  Package<> Formation and we varied formation and players on Sunday.

In NY, I think McAdoo even used the same formation though.