Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on QB struggles yesterday


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Baker didnt struggle yesterday due to a playbook though... he struggled bc the Browns knew to stand up at the line, and we couldnt stop Garrett. We also had 2 costly penalties that killed drives. 

The competiton didnt effect whether Baker was here for 40 days or 1 day. Baker has been here since he was traded for. 

It's not about Baker but Rhule. He admits he has only been here a little time and has set him up for failure.

You are way off the point and are defending something that there isn’t a fight over. Baker isn’t the biggest problem in Pantherlan. He wasn’t set up for success and they didn't call the plays in a way where he can thrive. Hint, it's not in a pass heavy O. This is all Rhule bashing and he earned it by being a crap HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's not about Baker but Rhule. He admits he has only been here a little time and has set him up for failure.

You are way off the point and are defending something that there isn’t a fight over. Baker isn’t the biggest problem in Pantherlan. He wasn’t set up for success and they didn't call the plays in a way where he can thrive. Hint, it's not in a pass heavy O. This is all Rhule bashing and he earned it by being a crap HC.

lol. The tweet of quoting Rhule was complimenting Baker for picking up the playbook so fast within a 30-40 day period. Rhule wasnt saying Baker was a problem. That is the context I am referring to.

Media types get to state whatever they want and do not get held accountable. Its pretty ridiculous. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

lol. The tweet of quoting Rhule was complimenting Baker for picking up the playbook so fast within a 30-40 day period. Rhule wasnt saying Baker was a problem. That is the context I am referring to.

You still can't see it and that is so much funnier. There is no media fuggery here, not that I can see. He is using the timeframe in the quote to suggest how clueless and craptastic Rhule is. That is zero slight to Baker but the coach. 

All Rhule had to say was Baker improved and got the lead back. Instead he opens his mouth and eventuslly runs into some BS he just said or did. It's his thing and it doesn't apear he will ever change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

You still can't see it and that is so much funnier. There is no media fuggery here, not that I can see. He is using the timeframe in the quote to suggest how clueless and craptastic Rhule is. That is zero slight to Baker but the coach. 

All Rhule had to say was Baker improved and got the lead back. Instead he opens his mouth and eventuslly runs into some BS he just said or did. It's his thing and it doesn't apear he will ever change.

what? The title of this thread is "Rhule on QB struggles yesterday" and then the tweet "Matt Rhule: “We are talking about playing with a quarterback who has been here 30 to 40 days”

Rhule wasnt talking about Baker struggling, he was stating that he thought Baker did well for being here for such a short period of time. I have no idea what you are attempting to state here.. this whole thing is misleading.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He needs a run game. It sets up his good playaction and covers his deficencies. His 4 years in Cleveland proved that.

yeah, and Baker probably should have handed off a bit more. However, I get it... he wanted to pick apart the browns... the story just didnt end that way. In the 2nd half, baker chose to give the ball to the backs more frequently. We actually went away from the RPO for a drive or two in the third. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

So we didn’t waste weeks of valuable reps on the worst starting QB of 2021 and PJ Walker?

Again how many reps did Aaron Rodgers,  Joe Burrows, Dak Prescott, Kyler Murray,  and other QBS who struggled week 1 have?? Either your going to answer.. Which is You don't know.. And realize week 1 is always like this for alot of Qb and offenses..

Especially 1's with new OC, New Olines, New QB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

yeah, and Baker probably should have handed off a bit more. However, I get it... he wanted to pick apart the browns... the story just didnt end that way. In the 2nd half, baker chose to give the ball to the backs more frequently. We actually went away from the RPO for a drive or two in the third. 

He will thrive with a heavy run game. His best year they ran 4th most yards. Other years were 4th, 12th and 13th. It really isn't hard or malicious. Just run the ball.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again how many reps did Aaron Rodgers,  Joe Burrows, Dak Prescott, Kyler Murray,  and other QBS who struggled week 1 have?? Either your going to answer.. Which is You don't know.. And realize week 1 is always like this for alot of Qb and offenses..

Especially 1's with new OC, New Olines, New QB..

Do you ever get tired of making these excuses for a head coach with back to back 5 win seasons who lost to every head coach that was fired?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...