Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on QB struggles yesterday


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Baker didnt struggle yesterday due to a playbook though... he struggled bc the Browns knew to stand up at the line, and we couldnt stop Garrett. We also had 2 costly penalties that killed drives. 

The competiton didnt effect whether Baker was here for 40 days or 1 day. Baker has been here since he was traded for. 

It's not about Baker but Rhule. He admits he has only been here a little time and has set him up for failure.

You are way off the point and are defending something that there isn’t a fight over. Baker isn’t the biggest problem in Pantherlan. He wasn’t set up for success and they didn't call the plays in a way where he can thrive. Hint, it's not in a pass heavy O. This is all Rhule bashing and he earned it by being a crap HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's not about Baker but Rhule. He admits he has only been here a little time and has set him up for failure.

You are way off the point and are defending something that there isn’t a fight over. Baker isn’t the biggest problem in Pantherlan. He wasn’t set up for success and they didn't call the plays in a way where he can thrive. Hint, it's not in a pass heavy O. This is all Rhule bashing and he earned it by being a crap HC.

lol. The tweet of quoting Rhule was complimenting Baker for picking up the playbook so fast within a 30-40 day period. Rhule wasnt saying Baker was a problem. That is the context I am referring to.

Media types get to state whatever they want and do not get held accountable. Its pretty ridiculous. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

lol. The tweet of quoting Rhule was complimenting Baker for picking up the playbook so fast within a 30-40 day period. Rhule wasnt saying Baker was a problem. That is the context I am referring to.

You still can't see it and that is so much funnier. There is no media fuggery here, not that I can see. He is using the timeframe in the quote to suggest how clueless and craptastic Rhule is. That is zero slight to Baker but the coach. 

All Rhule had to say was Baker improved and got the lead back. Instead he opens his mouth and eventuslly runs into some BS he just said or did. It's his thing and it doesn't apear he will ever change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

You still can't see it and that is so much funnier. There is no media fuggery here, not that I can see. He is using the timeframe in the quote to suggest how clueless and craptastic Rhule is. That is zero slight to Baker but the coach. 

All Rhule had to say was Baker improved and got the lead back. Instead he opens his mouth and eventuslly runs into some BS he just said or did. It's his thing and it doesn't apear he will ever change.

what? The title of this thread is "Rhule on QB struggles yesterday" and then the tweet "Matt Rhule: “We are talking about playing with a quarterback who has been here 30 to 40 days”

Rhule wasnt talking about Baker struggling, he was stating that he thought Baker did well for being here for such a short period of time. I have no idea what you are attempting to state here.. this whole thing is misleading.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He needs a run game. It sets up his good playaction and covers his deficencies. His 4 years in Cleveland proved that.

yeah, and Baker probably should have handed off a bit more. However, I get it... he wanted to pick apart the browns... the story just didnt end that way. In the 2nd half, baker chose to give the ball to the backs more frequently. We actually went away from the RPO for a drive or two in the third. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

So we didn’t waste weeks of valuable reps on the worst starting QB of 2021 and PJ Walker?

Again how many reps did Aaron Rodgers,  Joe Burrows, Dak Prescott, Kyler Murray,  and other QBS who struggled week 1 have?? Either your going to answer.. Which is You don't know.. And realize week 1 is always like this for alot of Qb and offenses..

Especially 1's with new OC, New Olines, New QB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

yeah, and Baker probably should have handed off a bit more. However, I get it... he wanted to pick apart the browns... the story just didnt end that way. In the 2nd half, baker chose to give the ball to the backs more frequently. We actually went away from the RPO for a drive or two in the third. 

He will thrive with a heavy run game. His best year they ran 4th most yards. Other years were 4th, 12th and 13th. It really isn't hard or malicious. Just run the ball.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again how many reps did Aaron Rodgers,  Joe Burrows, Dak Prescott, Kyler Murray,  and other QBS who struggled week 1 have?? Either your going to answer.. Which is You don't know.. And realize week 1 is always like this for alot of Qb and offenses..

Especially 1's with new OC, New Olines, New QB..

Do you ever get tired of making these excuses for a head coach with back to back 5 win seasons who lost to every head coach that was fired?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Other than being the offseason and there isn't much to talk about, why does anyone worry about the cap? We can do whatever we want and still have cap space. You don't think the front office hasn't already figured it out and what they intend to do. Me I am just sitting back and watching. After all my job isn't on the line if we lose. Although at my age we don't have forever if I am going to live to see us play in another superbowl
    • I get the TD's and I pointed it out, but like I said, when Burrow had more than double the TD's than Geno had, I think Higgins increased TDs compared to DK was more a product of Burrow and the Bengals offense than because of him vs DK as WRs. When one of their QB's finished 4th in MVP voting despite missing the playoffs and the other was just traded for a late 3rd round pick and replaced by Sam Darnold, I think that's a tough narrative to brush aside to just look at raw stats as well. Again, swap DK and Higgins last year, do you honestly believe DK wouldn't have put up better stats than Higgins did? Contracts and trade compensation aside, I'm taking DK over Higgins 100 out of 100 times, there is no debate about it for me.
    • More TDs last year in less games (double the TDs) and more yards per game. Those are some tough stats to brush aside. Career stats are good but we are wanting the player for what they are currently. DK had some drop issues too. 
×
×
  • Create New...