Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can they beat the Giants???


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Doubt it.  Prepare for another L.  

You mean the Giants that embarrassed us last season with a lame duck coach who was hired the same year as Rhule, that they picked over Rhule after Rhule took our offer to them and tried to get them to match it, who is now fired?  Those same Giants with our former GM that ran their team into the ground and completely depleted them of talent, who is also now fired?  Those Giants that were missing like all of their receiving corps, playmakers, and starting OL?  Those same Giants that despite all of that, beat the poo out of us and kept us from even achieving one first down in that game?

Yeah.  For all that changed for them since then, so much has remained the same for us, namely, Rhule is still our coach.  So, I will expect us to lose until we don't.

And those Giants who - just today - had the gall to go for the win (and was rewarded) while Rhule went ultra conservative for a FG (and was punished)? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Doubt it.  Prepare for another L.  

You mean the Giants that embarrassed us last season with a lame duck coach who was hired the same year as Rhule, that they picked over Rhule after Rhule took our offer to them and tried to get them to match it, who is now fired?  Those same Giants with our former GM that ran their team into the ground and completely depleted them of talent, who is also now fired?  Those Giants that were missing like all of their receiving corps, playmakers, and starting OL?  Those same Giants that despite all of that, beat the poo out of us and kept us from even achieving one first down in that game?

Yeah.  For all that changed for them since then, so much has remained the same for us, namely, Rhule is still our coach.  So, I will expect us to lose until we don't.

I'm all outta pie but this is 100% correct.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you're scratching your head wondering why we are losing to bad teams, and then it hits you.  We are the bad team.  Next week should be a better indicator of who we are and what to expect this season.  I'm willing to give some latitude for this being the first game and Baker didn't get it going until late.  That said, without a run defense we will need to score 30+ to have a chance.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...