Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Refs screwed us

gorillamilitia13

By gorillamilitia13,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

Once again back to namecalling. You've spent all this time carrying water for Rhule and screaming at CRA in thread after thread after thread after thread about Joe Brady but now it's all the refs. You are delusional beyond words.

You're still infatuated with Rhule.  Rhule sucked yesterday. 

This thread is about the refs, you know the guys in black in white whose ass your lips are attached to.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Just block him it will help the headaches....

I am no Rhule lover but actively rooting for failure in week 1 as he does grates my sense of knock a fool.

  Haters like him need to be checked.  He's going to be polishing the refs and Giants knobs all week.  Very troll-like.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

 hoping the refs will bail you out of a poor excuse for a football game is pretty weak.

When all else fails, go after the refs, I guess.

Thats the Browns. They were the ones bailed out by the refs.  We just want them to call a fair game.

There are a lot of people here on team Zebra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Football has been around for a long time.  If you lose because of the refs.  You still lost.  We put ourselves in position for the refs to be able to "impact" the game.  Because our team was unprepared, we had a bad gameplan, and stunk all game. 

Matt Rhule post game said he didn't believe the Browns could get in FG position in a minute.  He must not watch a lot of football then.  Because NFL teams routinely pull that off at the end of games. 

and the dope was left at the end of the game w/ a timeout.  Should of used it like the Broncos did week 1 in the Super Bowl rematch. 

Yes, the refs sucked.  Yes, they botched calls that last drive.  Refs botch calls.  They do it all game, in every game. 

In the end the better team won.  It is what it is.  But it would have been nice if they at least got the fake spike right.  Maybe if Matt Rhule knew how bad they botched it like he said....he should of gone apeshit in game on the refs about it and tired to get something done.  Didn't see that happen either.   That was the game.  And he didn't seem to care that much IMO. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anybodyhome said:

When you're a bad team with bad leadership and a complete lack of discipline across the spectrum, hoping the refs will bail you out of a poor excuse for a football game is pretty weak.

When all else fails, go after the refs, I guess.

Yep, because playing like dog poo for 3 straight quarters is the ref's fault.  Had we handled our business, that last drive for Cleveland wouldn't have mattered.  It only mattered because when the game was nearly out of hand, we finally figured out how to play football and made the game close.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darknight Community Regular

Darknight

Posted
Posted

CMC got 14 touches yesterday and people complained that he didn't get enough. CMC in the past was getting majority of the touches and people still complain.

That should have been a come back win for the Panthers despite all the mistakes we made in the first half. I just think Baker was too hyped in the first half. He started to mellow out as the game went out. Those tipped balls killed our drives. People were open. That fuging holding called on Ian Thomas killed a drive too. We just couldn't stop the run. If we could just stop them from running the ball we win that game easily.

The same coaching staff that people are talking poo about is the same coaching staff that coached this team to score 17 points in the 4th quarter. Even through all the poo that happened in the 1st 3 quarters, we had the lead and those two calls definitely played a part in that. People are dismissing those two calls because of their pure hatred for Rhule. 

I am not defending Rhule by no means. I killed him for calling the timeout at the end of the half when the Browns was going for it when they had no timeouts. I would have let them went for it and took my chances.

I blame this stupid ass defensive scheme that we got. We don't have players to stop the run. Every last one of them are undersized. There was a few times defenders did get in the backfield but they couldn't tackle. I'm pretty sure we are going to see the same thing with the Giants next week. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dynomite Enthusiast

dynomite

Posted
Posted

11 pages of two sides not arguing the other side in good faith. The thread is titled, "refs screwed us" not "the refs are the only reason we lost this game" if everyone in this thread agrees the refs made bad calls than the refs indeed screwed the panthers. Why are you arguing just to argue?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, poundaway said:

  Haters like him need to be checked.  He's going to be polishing the refs and Giants knobs all week.  Very troll-like.

I'll be here now the end of the season and in between unlike you who will go into hiding in December again if we are losing. That's called Fairweather. But keep crying about those haters and blaming everyone else. It won't help us win games.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...