I think we should be prepared to let burns walk

[SCO96]

51 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I'd like to see how he performs when utilized by a good DC in a strong NFL-style defense.  He looks like more of a fit for a 3-4, and as Scot said, he was drafted at a time when we were "sorta" switching to a 3-4 and we never really did.

The problem I see is the price tag he will command when the time comes.  The decision may be made for us.

Maybe it's me, but I don't feel like we have had a coherent defensive scheme/strategy since the brain trust at the time thought the 3-4 was the answer to our problems.  I'd like to see one before I start parting with talent.  If we don't see one, we probably have to be prepared to see him elsewhere, whether we like it or not.

 

Good post. I could see him causing all sorts of problems as an OLB in a 3-4 scheme coordinated by a Bill Belichik or a Wade Phillips type running the defense.

To make that work though you've got to have a massive presence at the NT to cover both A gaps and DE's capable of playing the B and C gaps. We'd need bigger lineman in the middle and on the EDGE.

I have wondered if D. Brown would be more affective as a DE in a 3-4 if he had Burns coming of the edge. He'd see less double teams on passing plays. We'd also need bigger ILB's. We'd need to make a firm commitment and it would take at least 2 seasons to acquire all the pieces, assuming you drafted the right players and acquired the right FA's. I don't think the saying "the answer is on the roster" applies to us right now.

Edited September 12, 2022 by SCO96

[Byrdman4real]

17 hours ago, Knaakedup said:

Completely agree with you. He’s too light. He would thrive being a standup LB in a 3-4.

This

[aml6609]

I don’t disagree with your take on Burns,  but letting him walk is INSANE. If we do anything we should move him now and get picks back. Same for CMC while he’s healthy, give whatever new regime Tepper brings in ammo to make things happen in the draft.