Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official cut list (updated @ 4pm)


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TANTRIC-NINJA said:

Tae seemed pretty sharp and polished in pre season. Hope we see him back on the roster when things get settled  

He'll end up on the PS if he's eligible. I think he has a high ceiling...just not quite as high as Stanley Thomas Oliver's according to our coaching staff. STO is also pretty good at ST. 

Speaking of which, I think that's the only justifiable reason Chandler and Franklin are still here imo. These two and Rhule are so attached I get'em mixed up. 

Side notes: 

Shi Smith should have made Robert's expendable. 

Lavishka definitely upgrades the WR depth.  

Our DE depth on one side, weight wise, is paper thin lol. We have four DE's as of right now. Three on the right with Burns being the heaviest of the three...yeah that might be a problem down the road. 

Not alot of power but at least we'll be fast...smh

P.S. Zlystra, Barnes, Lovett, Kirkwood, or Wright will end up a Patriot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Didn't he have the lowest rated single game grade out of all olinemen last season by PFF? Shouldn't be that tough to replace. Maybe even a tackling dummy would suffice.

Jordan would have been cut if we hadn't been able to deal Daley. We didn't want to keep just 8 OL, so he stuck.  Dude is hanging on by a thread and can easily be replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Jermaine Carter just got his ass cut by the Chiefs 

I think people were a little traumatized by back to back years of Whitehead then Carter. Shaq/Luvu/Littleton/Smith/Wilson with Chinn up in the box more since Xavier can cover should be solid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Didn't he have the lowest rated single game grade out of all olinemen last season by PFF? Shouldn't be that tough to replace. Maybe even a tackling dummy would suffice.

I really think (maybe just hopium) that he'll be supplanted by someone we out of the NFL's garbage bin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...